Summary: | libcap-1.10.ebuild (New Package) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Francisco Gimeno <kikov> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Robin Johnson <robbat2> |
Status: | VERIFIED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | kikov, pfeifer, sascha-gentoo-bugzilla |
Priority: | High | Keywords: | EBUILD |
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
libcap-1.10.ebuild
Reviewed ebuild for libcap Python support for libcap-1.10 ebuild for libcap with Python support |
Description
Francisco Gimeno
2002-05-02 07:27:27 UTC
Created attachment 760 [details]
libcap-1.10.ebuild
Created attachment 2574 [details]
Reviewed ebuild for libcap
Created attachment 2599 [details, diff]
Python support for libcap-1.10
After applying this patch, libcap will optionally create a Python module using
SWIG.
Created attachment 2600 [details]
ebuild for libcap with Python support
Reviewed libcap ebuild with optional (via USE flag) Python support
added EBUILD keyword for the moment, waiting for response from reporter after posting on -dev ML. ebuild comments from -dev posting: add SLOT, add KEYWORDS, add IUSE, 'use foo' statement style, use PATCHES="..." instead of patch+src_unpack, local variable declarations, unnessicary statement block in src_install, broken homepage URI, ALL documentation with the package should be installed (manpages and even the guys pgp key) , einstall instead of 'make install' and most importantly, include a ChangeLog for the ebuild! Great! it works wel, using it to build current jack from cvs with capabilities (with USE=-python) Francisco: I have come across a few more things using libcap myself now, so just fix the ebuild with the issues mentioned in my note on 2003-04-29, and I will commit the package. ebuild will be in the tree shortly, waiting for a response from -core and -dev on the license, as it is not the GPL-2 license in this package. commited to CVS. it's sys-libs/libcap. If you have access to alternate non-x86 arches, please test it and report back. Closing bug properly. Umm I closed this bug? closing AGAIN |