Bug 23136 - spamass-milter-0.1.3a.ebuild, spamass-milter-0.2.0 ebuild
Bug#: 23136 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 1.4_rc4 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: nick@capital-internet.net Reported By: vadim.k@sapiens.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: spamass-milter-0.1.3a.ebuild, spamass-milter-0.2.0 ebuild
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2003-06-19 14:03 0000
Description:   Opened: 2003-06-19 14:03 0000
Hi,

I've attached spamass-milter.gentoo-ebuild.tar.gz, which contains
spamass-milter-0.1.3a.ebuild.
spamass-milter is a little plugin for the Sendmail Milter (Mail Filter) library
that pipes all incoming mail (including things received by rmail/UUCP) through
the SpamAssassin, a highly customizable SpamFilter.
(http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/spamass-milt/)
I've seccessfully install it from this ebuild on x86 and sparc64 platform.
Of course it requirs sendmail and Mail-SpamAssassin.
I beliave it belongs to net-mail/
Besides rc-update add, installation requires changing sendmail.mc (sendmail.cf)
file. It is noted in the package README file.

Thanks,
Vadim.

------- Comment #1 From Vadim Kuznetsov 2003-06-19 14:05:42 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=13569) [details]
spamass-milter-0.1.3a.ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Vadim Kuznetsov 2003-07-16 13:06:37 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=14562) [details]
spamass-milter-0.2.0 ebuild

Version bump

------- Comment #3 From Vadim Kuznetsov 2003-07-16 13:11:06 0000 -------
I've attached new spamass-milter-0.2.0.gentoo-ebuild.tar.gz, which contains
previous ebuild and new spamass-milter-0.2.0 ebuild.
Also i've updated rc files.

Thanks,

Vadim Kuznetsov

------- Comment #4 From Nick Hadaway 2003-07-16 14:49:49 0000 -------
spamass-milter-0.2.0 is now in portage.  I made some minor ebuild changes and
added README.gentoo with more specific instructions on how to setup sendmail
properly.

please let me know if you find any problems with the ebuild I added to portage.
If there is no issue I will quickly put it to stable.

------- Comment #5 From Steven Green 2004-07-16 04:18:11 0000 -------
See also http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57275