Summary: | apache build failuer with libtool-2.2.x | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Peter Volkov (RETIRED) <pva> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Apache Team - Bugzilla Reports <apache-bugs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | ansla80, holger, niel.drummond, reuben-gentoo-bugzilla, spock |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44817 | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 212763 |
Description
Peter Volkov (RETIRED)
2008-05-05 12:25:44 UTC
*** Bug 220729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** The fix doesn't work, unfortunately. I got around it by reemerging libtool-1.5.x, emerge apache, and then reemerging libtool-2.2.x But then, I don't know whether the mod_authn_file still works or not. Will test. Roby, how did you applied patch? You have to incorporate it into apache patchset to make build system handle it correctly... The patch works for me as well. The patch works for me too, ~amd64, sys-devel/libtool-2.2.4 www-servers/apache-2.2.8-r2 patch works for me too. amd64 www-servers/apache-2.2.8-r2 sys-devel/libtool-2.2.4 Upstream has accepted my patch. How can I apply the patch to the apache patch set? Isn't an ordinary epatch statement enough? If even upstream accepted this patch, why didn't it hit the tree during recent revbump ? (In reply to comment #10) > If even upstream accepted this patch, why didn't it hit the tree during recent > revbump ? > because it was just a security revbump Well, this patch doesn't break anything for libtool 1.5 and fixes a problem with libtool 2 AND got accepted by upstream. And don't forget that it's the latest in tree so it will affect ~arch the moment libtool 2 gets unmasked again. And as a sidenote: it seems that substitute useflag is missing a description, at least it did when I syncd about 2 hours ago. Sorry, my mistake - substitute is not a useflag. fixed in 2.2.8-r4 |