Bug 219599 - sci-chemistry/apbs version bump to 1.0.0
Bug#: 219599 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: All Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: markusle@gentoo.org Reported By: jlec@j-schmitz.net
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://apbs.sourceforge.net/
Summary: sci-chemistry/apbs version bump to 1.0.0
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2008-04-28 14:48 0000
Description:   Opened: 2008-04-28 14:48 0000
Apbs bumps from 0.5.1 to 1.0.0.
A simple bump in version number of the ebuild compiles and works fine on my x86
box with gcc and gfortran. But an implementation for openmpi was introduced,
enabled with --enable-openmpi while configuring, which doesn't work out of the
box. Here some affored should be placed.

------- Comment #1 From Markus Dittrich 2008-04-29 01:20:07 0000 -------
Hi Justin,

Thanks much for the note and I am almost done with
the new ebuild. I would like to still enable some of
the tests that ship with the tarball; we'll see if
that pans out.

best,
Markus

------- Comment #2 From Markus Dittrich 2008-04-30 01:32:24 0000 -------
I committed apbs-1.0.0 to portage cvs.

Thanks,
Markus

------- Comment #3 From Justin Lecher (jlec) 2008-04-30 09:11:03 0000 -------
Thank you Markus.
It is working fine. 
Is there a reason why ifc isn't supported as compiler? On my box it is working
fine.
There is another thing with the pymol plugin. In the mpi mode apbs writes out
its potentials with "-PE0" as an extension. This causes the plugin to fail,
because it doesn't expect that. I try to report upstream, but sf is down.
Perhaps we could patch it ourself. I'm not familiar with python so I cannot
contribute. 

------- Comment #4 From Markus Dittrich 2008-04-30 13:03:41 0000 -------
Hi Justin,

Regarding ifc/ifort: I don't use them so I don't typically
check if packages work with them or not. If I get a chance
to install the compilers on one of my dev boxes sometime
I'll have a look. Thanks for pointing this out.

Regarding the pymol problem. Could you email me a short
testcase that would allow me to reproduce and
check into this?

Thanks,
Markus