Bug 219292 - High CPU usage in www-client/opera-9.50_beta1
|
Bug#:
219292
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: jer@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: chescu@gmail.com
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: High CPU usage in www-client/opera-9.50_beta1
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2008-04-25 20:54 0000
|
I updated from www-client/opera-9.2* (which, excluding Flash problem, worked
fine for me) to www-client/opera-9.50_beta1 (which is keyword-masked but not
package.mask masked).
The problem I found with 9.50 Beta 1 is that when typing an URL in the address
bar, when pops the autocompletion listbox, Opera increases its CPU usage
getting more than 90%.
I deleted ~/.opera and it worked fine at a first time. But after a few days
using Opera when I have visited many websited the problem reappeared, so I
suppose it's related to this new feature that searchs what you are typing in
the address bar through history and cache.
Then I updated to latest Beta 2 weeklie build available in Portage and the
problem seems fixed.
That's why I think www-client/opera-9.50_beta1 should be masked.
Er, try www-client/opera-9.50_beta2!
(In reply to comment #1)
> Er, try www-client/opera-9.50_beta2!
>
As you can read above:
"Then I updated to latest Beta 2 weeklie build available in Portage and the
problem seems fixed."
Oh, sorry. Hadn't read all of it yet.
I fail to see how users would miss the update when they sync their trees and
update the world target. A package manager shouldn't care whether or not beta1
is masked - it should automatically update to beta2.
But I will cut you a deal. I will simply remove beta1 from the tree - it's a
rather unstable snapshot and it lacks features compared to the latest beta2
snapshots.
Thanks for pointing me in this direction.
