Bug 215839 - please keyword sci-libs/ccolamd
Bug#: 215839 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: sci@gentoo.org Reported By: markusle@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://www.cise.ufl.edu/research/sparse/ccolamd
Summary: please keyword sci-libs/ccolamd
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2008-04-02 10:41 0000
Description:   Opened: 2008-04-02 10:41 0000
Hi,

Could we please keyword ccolamd on your arches. It is
needed for the sparse matrix support of the upcoming 
octave-3.0.0.

Thanks,
Markus

------- Comment #1 From Markus Rothe 2008-04-07 15:36:33 0000 -------
added ~ppc64

------- Comment #2 From Tobias Klausmann 2008-04-07 19:19:51 0000 -------
Keyworded on alpha.

------- Comment #3 From Raúl Porcel 2008-04-12 16:02:44 0000 -------
~sparc done

------- Comment #4 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-12 16:12:30 0000 -------
Anymore of these that hppa should know about?

# ChangeLog for sci-mathematics/octave
# Copyright 2002-2008 Gentoo Foundation; Distributed under the GPL v2
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/sci-mathematics/octave/ChangeLog,v 1.57
2008/04/09 01:44:57 jer Exp $

  09 Apr 2008; Jeroen Roovers <jer@gentoo.org> octave-2.1.73-r2.ebuild:
  Marked ~hppa (bug #216855).

------- Comment #5 From Markus Dittrich 2008-04-13 11:01:19 0000 -------
> Anymore of these that hppa should know about?

There's one more (#215834), and I'll cc you on
the bug.

Thanks,
Markus

------- Comment #6 From Jeroen Roovers 2008-04-15 15:47:38 0000 -------
> (In reply to comment #5)
> Anymore of these that hppa should know about?
> 
> There's one more (#215834), and I'll cc you on
> the bug.

Thanks!


Marked ~hppa.

------- Comment #7 From Markus Dittrich 2008-05-21 12:37:00 0000 -------
@ppc: Are there any problems with keywording this package?

------- Comment #8 From Justin Bronder 2008-05-22 01:12:49 0000 -------
As I'm lucky enough get get access to ppc machines somtimes, I'm keywording
this, going on the assumption that what was said in
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216120#c9 still stands.

Last arch I believe, closing.