Bug 207684 - Please stabilise =kde-misc/krusader-1.80.0
Bug#: 207684 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: kde@gentoo.org Reported By: djvinz@gmail.com
Component: KDE
URL:  http://groups.google.com/group/krusader-devel/browse_thread/thread/3c5fee57d8b674d0/caaaf7d5c217f54a?lnk=raot
Summary: Please stabilise =kde-misc/krusader-1.80.0
Keywords:  STABLEREQ
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2008-01-27 14:28 0000
Description:   Opened: 2008-01-27 14:28 0000
When trying to compile krusader-1.70.1,
using use flags: arts javascript kde xinerama
with gcc 4.2.2, it stops complaining about:
../VFS/vfs.h:137: error: invalid pure specifier (only `= 0' is allowed) before
';' token

This is normal, as of gcc 4, there _is_ a difference between '0' and '0L'.
The '0L' in vfs.h, at the end of line 137 should be replaced by '0'.
Then everything compiles fine.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Try to compile krusader-1.70.1,
using use flags: arts javascript kde xinerama
using gcc 4

Actual Results:  
../VFS/vfs.h:137: error: invalid pure specifier (only `= 0' is allowed) before
';' token

Expected Results:  
Compile up normally

This is normal, as of gcc 4, there _is_ a difference between '0' and '0L'.
The '0L' in vfs.h, at the end of line 137 should be replaced by '0'.
Then everything compiles fine.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2008-01-27 14:44:28 0000 -------
Why don't we stabilize 1.80.0?

------- Comment #2 From Ingmar Vanhassel (RETIRED) 2008-01-27 15:03:17 0000 -------
This has been in the tree for 6 months, the last bug report has been even
longer. The current stable version doesn't compile with gcc-4.2.

Thus, Arches, please stabilize =kde-misc/krusader-1.80.0.
Target keywords: amd64 ppc ppc64 sparc x86

Thank you.

------- Comment #3 From Maxime Vincent 2008-01-27 15:42:06 0000 -------
I'm sorry if this report is a double..
I didn't find anything on 'krusader' in the bugzilla..

It's true that i'm using gcc 4.2.2,
but I suppose it's not compiling up with gcc 4.1.x either, or is it?

I agree 1.80.0 should be stabilized though...

Thanks!

------- Comment #4 From Wulf Krueger (RETIRED) 2008-01-27 15:56:53 0000 -------
Marked stable on amd64.

------- Comment #5 From Brent Baude 2008-01-27 16:27:14 0000 -------
ppc64 done

------- Comment #6 From Maxime Vincent 2008-01-27 17:09:59 0000 -------
thanks!

------- Comment #7 From Bo Ørsted Andresen (RETIRED) 2008-01-27 17:42:43 0000 -------
Please don't mark the bug fixed before all arches are done. Thanks.

------- Comment #8 From Raúl Porcel 2008-01-29 13:45:42 0000 -------
sparc/x86 stable

------- Comment #9 From nixnut 2008-01-31 17:15:09 0000 -------
ppc stable. closing sicne we're last.