Summary: | net-fs/nfs-utils - rpc.statd fails to start due to is_running() in init script returning wrong value | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | sourlover <SourLover> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Network Filesystems <net-fs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
sourlover
2007-12-29 02:31:44 UTC
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60362 *** I did find that bug before, along with a number of others, but nothing there helps solve this problem. Please don't close bugs without looking into them. Yeah I did look at the bug. Complain to whomever closed the original one, this is the same dupe like the rest of others there. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60362 *** It does actually contain more info than the others. And since I can't reopen them, what am I supposed to do? Mail vapier (he closed the "original" bug)? If you were trying to be helpful, you might have assigned the bug to him insted of closing it. This is exact same thing like Bug 175287 which was marked as dupe bug 60362; so yeah, take this w/ vapier and ask him why's the original bug resolved. i dont know why you think it's a duplicate because it isnt prob because i mis-duped Bug 175287 ... oh well legate: do you have RPCSTATDOPTS set ? no, that isnt the problem ... problem is that the killall detects the init.d script itself which is also named "rpc.statd" :/ should be fixed in cvs http://sources.gentoo.org/net-fs/nfs-utils/files/rpc.statd.initd?r1=1.3&r2=1.4 Wow, way to think outside the box.. It's one of those things I never would have come up with, without going all-out with ltrace or the like. Especially since the next call in start() is a "return 0", which I just assumed was getting run. And I was really starting to question my sanity.. Whatever you're making, you need to be in a higher pay grade. Thanks. |