Bug 184716 - alsa-utils-1.0.14.ebuild still has an ugly "XXX write TLV"
|
Bug#:
184716
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: x86
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: minor
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: alsa-bugs@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: grafgrimm77@gmx.de
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: alsa-utils-1.0.14.ebuild still has an ugly "XXX write TLV"
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2007-07-09 11:03 0000
|
alsa-utils-1.0.14/alsactl/state.c has the bad looking line:
fprintf(stderr, "XXX write TLV...\n");
this is printed out while booting init phase
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rc-update add alsasound boot
2. reboot
3. look at the boot messages
Actual Results:
XXX write TLV
Expected Results:
no such a message
i created a patch and tested it successfully. here it works now. the ugly
message is gone while booting.
(In reply to comment #2)
> Created an attachment (id=124317) [edit] [details]
> new patch alsa-utils-1.0.14-xxx-write-tlv.patch
>
Silencing errors from code is probably not something that upstream would accept
but you can try. Any way please submit your issue upstream too.
> Silencing errors from code is probably not something that upstream would accept
> but you can try. Any way please submit your issue upstream too.
i do not understand. how to submit this issue upstream?
beside: i accepted the patch and i think this is not only my issue. ;-)
I'm not going to incorporate this change unless UPSTREAM agrees on that. Sorry.
is it really such hard to take responsibility for deleting the ugly message
"XXX write TLV" caused by an obviously debugging relict in the file state.c of
alsa-utils? unbelievable!
(In reply to comment #8)
> is it really such hard to take responsibility for deleting the ugly message
> "XXX write TLV" caused by an obviously debugging relict in the file state.c of
> alsa-utils? unbelievable!
>
Keeping patches in sync with upstream changes requires work which can be
avoided when the changes are merged upstream.
(In reply to comment #9)
>
> Please reopen this bug.
>
done