Bug 181441 - kde-base/{kdebase-3.5.8-r6,kdm-3.5.8-r1}: Ignored LDFLAGS: /usr/kde/3.5/bin/kdm
|
Bug#:
181441
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: minor
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: kde@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: arfrever@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: KDE
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: kde-base/{kdebase-3.5.8-r6,kdm-3.5.8-r1}: Ignored LDFLAGS: /usr/kde/3.5/bin/kdm
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2007-06-09 17:06 0000
|
/var/tmp/portage/kde-base/kdebase-3.5.7/image/usr/kde/3.5/bin/kdm
[ 3] .hash HASH 08048188 000188 000510 04 A 5 0 4
Maybe you could elaborate on how did you come to the conclusion that your
LDFLAGS are ignored, which ones are ignored and where's the problem. The above
cryptic stuff unfortunately doesn't explain anything.
(In reply to comment #1)
> Maybe you could elaborate on how did you come to the conclusion that your
> LDFLAGS are ignored
Some LDFLAGS can change existence of some sections in ELF files. I have such
(at least) 2 flags in my LDFLAGS and one of them always change existence of
some sections when isn't ignored.
I changed /usr/lib/portage/bin/prepstrip, so that it now additionally runs
readelf and grep and copy the output to the log file.
I perform some tests (reading emerge logs) and >99,5% of results are correct.
> which ones are ignored
All.
> and where's the problem.
Ignoring LDLFAGS increases files sizes and decreases performance.
OK, that was about enough.
1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev
mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific*
issue.
I have attached the patch.
Fixed in 3.5.9, thanks for the patch.
