Bug 179327 - sci-biology/t-coffee-4.96 stabilisation request
|
Bug#:
179327
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: CANTFIX
|
Assigned To: ribosome@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: ribosome@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: Applications
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: sci-biology/t-coffee-4.96 stabilisation request
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2007-05-21 15:42 0000
|
I would appreciate if all supporting arches (x86, ppc) would stabilise
sci-biology/t-coffee. It has been in Portage for a while and works well.
Sources for the latest current stable version are no longer available, so I
want to remove that version ASAP.
Test instructions:
After compiling t-coffee, copy the "sample_seq1.fasta" file from
"/usr/share/t-coffee/example" to your home directory. This file contains the
amino acid sequences for four homologs of a protein in different species.
Run "t_coffee sample_seq1.fasta" to have t-coffee align the sequences,
calculate the alignment scores, construct a dendrogram, etc. Output files are
created in the working directory.
You can check the validity of the calculations by comparing the file
"sample_seq1.aln" with the file I am attaching. (This output file is also
available in the example directory, but it was created with an old version of
the program, and the formatting is a bit different so you would have to compare
the files manually. With the provided file, a diff should suffice.) The only
difference between the files should be the CPU time used for the calculations.
Thanks in advance,
I'm seeing some differences between the output of t-coffee and your file:
diff sample_seq1.aln sample_seq1.aln.bugzie
1c1
< CLUSTAL FORMAT for T-COFFEE Version_4.96 [http://www.tcoffee.org], CPU=0.17
sec, SCORE=34, Nseq=4, Len=81
---
> CLUSTAL FORMAT for T-COFFEE Version_5.05 [http://www.tcoffee.org], CPU=0.08 sec, SCORE=33, Nseq=4, Len=81
2a3,4
> hmgl_trybr kkdsnapkramtsfmffssdfrskhsdls-----ivemskaagaawkelgpeerkvyeem
> hmgt_mouse -----kpkrprsayniyvsesfqeakdds-----aqgklklvneawknlspeekqayiql
4d5
< hmgl_trybr kkdsnapkramtsfmffssdfrskhs-----dlsivemskaagaawkelgpeerkvyeem
6,7c7
< hmgt_mouse -----kpkrprsayniyvsesfqeakddsaqgkl-----klvneawknlspeekqayiql
< ***. ::: .: .. .. . * . *: * : :
---
> ***. ::: .: .. .. . . * . *: * : :
9d8
< hmgb_chite aatakqnyiralqeyern-gg
11d9
< hmgl_wheat anklkgeynkaiaaynkgesa
12a11,12
> hmgb_chite aatakqnyiralqeyern-gg
> hmgl_wheat anklkgeynkaiaaynkgesa
beer >> coffee; sending back to maintainer... :P
confirmed on an another G4. ribosome?
This should not happen, so I think it is best for version 4.96 not to be
stabilised on PPC. These variations could be caused by the magnification of a
small number-rounding difference. The differences are very small, though, and
probably do not impact the alignment's validity, so I do not think it is
necessary to mask t-coffee in the PPC profiles.
This leaves the problem of missing sources for the last (and only) stable PPC
version. I suggest dropping the stable keyword and having t-coffee available
only in the testing branch (for PPC).
What do you PPC folk think?
(In reply to comment #6)
> This leaves the problem of missing sources for the last (and only) stable PPC
> version. I suggest dropping the stable keyword and having t-coffee available
> only in the testing branch (for PPC).
>
> What do you PPC folk think?
That's okay for us. Just drop the stable-version and keep the current version
~ppc.
So, let's close this bug.