Bug 179074 - app-text/bibus-1.3.0 version bump
Bug#: 179074 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: sci@gentoo.org Reported By: sybillel@free.fr
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/bibus-biblio/
Summary: app-text/bibus-1.3.0 version bump
Keywords:  EBUILD
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2007-05-19 08:09 0000
Description:   Opened: 2007-05-19 08:09 0000
Hi, bibus-1.3.0 has been out since December 15, 2006 (I've just started using
the app myself). Would a version bump be possible?

Here's a link to the changelog/release notes:
http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?release_id=471614&group_id=110943

I've tried renaming the ebuild from version 1.2.0. When I try to merge, there
is an error about permissions not being correct on the /usr/local/share/bibus
directory. Error log is attached. I also was not able to install from source
directly due to the paths (bibus tried to install to /share/bibus and I haven't
figured out how to tell it to use the right prefix). Sorry about my lack of
skills to be able to fix this.

There is a report on  the forums of bibus-1.3.0 installing fine from source
although with a python downgrade (2.4 -> 2.3) but then having some integration
problems with OpenOffice.org:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-545922-highlight-bibus.html
That's on a 64-bit machine, though.

Thanks in advance!

------- Comment #1 From sybille 2007-05-19 08:11:17 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=119672) [details]
error log when ebuild from bibus-1.2.0 is used to merge 1.3.0

------- Comment #2 From Attila Tóth 2007-06-20 21:34:55 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=122640) [details]
Modified 1.2.0 bibus ebuild

Proper generation of bibus.cfg and single directory for docs

------- Comment #3 From Attila Tóth 2007-06-20 21:35:43 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=122641) [details]
DIff for modified 1.2.0 bibus ebuild

------- Comment #4 From Attila Tóth 2007-06-20 21:36:20 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=122642) [details]
Bibus 1.3.0 ebuild

Version bump

------- Comment #5 From Attila Tóth 2007-06-20 21:37:11 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=122644) [details]
DIff for 1.3.0 bibus ebuild

Proper bibus.cfg, single docs directory

------- Comment #6 From Jannick Kuhr 2007-08-14 13:29:23 0000 -------
Thank you very much.

I tested the ebuild for version 1.3 (including the patch) on amd64 using a
sqlite database. Everything works without any problems.

I use bibus in combination with OOo for my master thesis on WindowsXP and
Gentoo with the same database, style and OOo document on a USB stick. Even the
interaction between the two systems works flawlessly.

It would be nice to see this ebuild (with ~amd64 keyword added) in portage.

------- Comment #7 From Attila Tóth 2008-02-06 22:20:09 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=142853) [details]
bibus-1.4.0-r1.ebuild

Older versions of bibus don't take care of multislot wxwidget installs. So if
you upgrade your wxGTK and wxpython to 2.8.7.1, it'll open a new slot and your
previous bibus won't start. The workaround would be pretty simple, but upstream
has already taken care of this. So I version bumped the ebuild to 1.4. It only
required some minor modifications due to the unusual directory name of the
packed source code.

Test and enjoy!

------- Comment #8 From Attila Tóth 2008-02-06 22:21:55 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=142854) [details]
necessary diff for bibus-1.4.0-r1.ebuild

The diff file remained pretty much the same. But I reattach it to make it
clear.

------- Comment #9 From Attila Tóth 2008-02-06 22:24:13 0000 -------
If you are using MySQL, be aware of the fact, that the database needs to be
extended by one additional table. Check this out before use!

Regards,
Dwokfur

(In reply to comment #8)
> Created an attachment (id=142854) [edit] [details]
> necessary diff for bibus-1.4.0-r1.ebuild
> 
> The diff file remained pretty much the same. But I reattach it to make it
> clear.
> 

------- Comment #10 From Markus Dittrich 2008-02-08 14:18:59 0000 -------
Thanks to all for the great work! I've just committed bibus-1.4.0-rc2
to portage since it seems to work fine for me as far as I can tell.

Please open a new bug should there be any problems with
it.

Thanks,
Markus