Summary: | app-editors/emacs-cvs-22.0.95-r1 needs autoconf-2.61 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | lkml_ccc |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Emacs project <emacs> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
lkml_ccc
2007-03-14 23:25:49 UTC
Which ebuild version is this about? (In reply to comment #1) > Which ebuild version is this about? > Sorry, this is 22.0.95-r1 Erm, don't see any missing dependency there... WANT_AUTOCONF="latest" (In reply to comment #3) > Erm, don't see any missing dependency there... > > WANT_AUTOCONF="latest" > But latest in my configuration is 2.60. So latest isn't enough, >=2.61 would be enough. So upgrade to 2.61, it's stable. (In reply to comment #5) > So upgrade to 2.61, it's stable. > [I] sys-devel/autoconf Available versions: (2.1) 2.13 (2.5) 2.59-r7 2.60 [M]2.61 Installed versions: 2.13(2.1)(22:52:32 17/04/2005) 2.60(2.5)(20:03:58 29/01/2007)(-emacs) Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/autoconf.html Description: Used to create autoconfiguration files I see it's masked. (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > So upgrade to 2.61, it's stable. > > > > [I] sys-devel/autoconf > Available versions: > (2.1) 2.13 > (2.5) 2.59-r7 2.60 [M]2.61 > Installed versions: 2.13(2.1)(22:52:32 17/04/2005) 2.60(2.5)(20:03:58 > 29/01/2007)(-emacs) > Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/autoconf.html > Description: Used to create autoconfiguration files > > I see it's masked. > (In reply to comment #5) > So upgrade to 2.61, it's stable. > It's masked in hardened profiles: # Christian Heim <phreak@gentoo.org> (28 January 2007) # Mask sys-devel/autoconf-2.61 due to bug #161566 =sys-devel/autoconf-2.61 And anyway that does not mean you can should live with unaccurate dependencies isn't it? Yeah, you can get emacs-cvs masked as well if you really wish... The dependencies are just fine. Fixed, thanks |