Summary: | media-tv/tvbrowser-2.5 - The search function doesn't work | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Heiko Baums <heiko.baums> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Matthias Schwarzott <zzam> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | crazy-ivanovic, java, renegart |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2006.1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: | tvbrowserlog |
Description
Heiko Baums
2007-03-11 04:11:01 UTC
Created attachment 112888 [details]
tvbrowserlog
The console output.
For me the search function can be opened if the selected skin is not "Skin Look and Feel". That bug is strange, and perhaps located in dev-java/skinlf. I'm using "Skin Look and Feel". Without it the search works for me, too. But in upstream's binary package the search function also works with "Skin Look and Feel". I of course don't know which version of skinlf they are using. They use 6.7, we have 1.2.12 (shouldn't be that different, they changed versioning). However, tried to run it with their bundled skinlf.jar and it was the same, so that's not it. upstream l2fprod-common-tasks.jar is 6.11, our 6.9.1, but also no difference. Replacing tvbrowser.jar with upstream solved it, but not sure if it's due to the dependencies' classes bundled in that jar (btw even our built jar absorbs some deps, that's bad) or the code of tvbrowser itself. (In reply to comment #5) > > Replacing tvbrowser.jar with upstream solved it, but not sure if it's due to > the dependencies' classes bundled in that jar (btw even our built jar absorbs > some deps, that's bad) or the code of tvbrowser itself. > What are the bundled classes? I did not recognize anything in 2.5.2. (In reply to comment #6) > What are the bundled classes? I did not recognize anything in 2.5.2. That was written "against" 2.5 and was fixed since then. (In reply to comment #4) > They use 6.7, we have 1.2.12 (shouldn't be that different, they changed > versioning). However, tried to run it with their bundled skinlf.jar and it was > the same, so that's not it. Weird, I bumped skinlf to 6.7 and problem solved... thus I raised the dep in 2.5.2 to >=6.7, seems fixed. |