Bug 168287 – dev-java/tomcat-native-1.1.8 stabilization request

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 04:12:07 UTC]

Stabilization request for Tomcat's native ssl accelerator. To test likely need to just emerge tomcat, and start it. Either 5.5, or 6.0.x. It should look for and load the native library by default. Sometimes requires path to be specified to Tomcat. Check tomcat log file for confirmation of loading or not, it will be at very top of catalina*.log file.

[Comment 1 William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 04:18:30 UTC]

By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 

[Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 11:57:18 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 

 Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?

[Comment 3 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2007-02-25 12:44:59 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > By the way this will need apr 1.2.x to be stabilized first. Not sure exactly
> > where that package is at, or it's deps. I just looked into it a bit and seems
> > like apr and apr-util can be stabilized. 
> 
>  Apache team, are you ok with apr going stable?

I think they are fine, but you'll have to ask for Bryan's/Luca's opinion. I haven't seen any breakage with it yet (neither subversion nor apache), but we still need to keep the old apr around, since the older (that's pre 2.2) still depends on it.

[Comment 4 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-02-26 07:11:29 UTC]

x86 stable

[Comment 5 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) 2007-04-12 20:09:15 UTC]

amd64 stable and closing

[Comment 6 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2007-05-12 14:02:01 UTC]

Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?

[Comment 7 Christian Heim (RETIRED) 2007-05-13 11:24:59 UTC]

(In reply to comment #6)
> Can anyone tell me why dev-libs/apr-1.2.8 went stable, but the corresponding
> dev-libs/apr-util version didn't!?

Looks like opfer forgot about that.

[Comment 8 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2007-05-15 19:08:20 UTC]

Closing this bug again in favor of bug 178264.