Summary: | app-admin/testdisk-6.5 stable request | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Daniel Webert <rockoo> |
Component: | New packages | Assignee: | Forensics Herd [disbanded] <forensics+obsolete> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | enhancement | CC: | maxicombina |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Daniel Webert
2007-01-29 19:20:31 UTC
as per bug 152380 the previous version had an endless loop. testplan: 1. testdisk /debug and have a look around /dev/hda /dev/sda 2. photorec /dev/sda should pull all photos (and a few other filetypes) out of the raw disk /dev/sda photorec can also work with disk images (http://sourceforge.net/projects/dftt/ for diskcarving samples) test2:
> 2. photorec /dev/sda
> should pull all photos (and a few other filetypes) out of the raw disk /dev/sda
photorec works fine overhere - recovered 300MB from my usb/vfat
x86 stable ppc stable It stable on amd64 now (I have just emerge --sync and saw it). However, it seems NOT to be present in any repository... Should I issue a new bug? (In reply to comment #5) > It stable on amd64 now (I have just emerge --sync and saw it). Really? app-admin/testdisk $ fgrep KEY * testdisk-6.5.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ppc x86" testdisk-6.6.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~x86" > However, it seems NOT to be present in any repository... http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=testdisk Really? > Should I issue a new > bug? No, but I am confused. > Really? > app-admin/testdisk $ fgrep KEY * > testdisk-6.5.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ppc x86" > testdisk-6.6.ebuild:KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~ppc ~x86" Yep, you are right (I had unmasked it in /etc/portage/package.keywords) :$ > > However, it seems NOT to be present in any repository... > > http://packages.gentoo.org/search/?sstring=testdisk > Really? Yep. As of yesterday no mirror had the latest testdisk (6.6). Right now, I coudl download one, but the checksum does not match. > No, but I am confused. Hope it's clear now. |