Bug 163745 - Please give testing keyword love to app-portage/gatt-svn
Bug#: 163745 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: fauli@gentoo.org Reported By: fauli@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: Please give testing keyword love to app-portage/gatt-svn
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2007-01-25 12:11 0000
Description:   Opened: 2007-01-25 12:11 0000 
It has a test suite, so you can verify if it works.  Thanks

------- Comment #1 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2007-01-26 14:24:35 0000 ------- 
~sparc'd.

------- Comment #2 From nixnut 2007-02-10 18:50:06 0000 ------- 
~ppc keyword added

------- Comment #3 From Piotr Jaroszyński 2007-02-13 13:24:36 0000 ------- 
phoebe gatt-svn # gatt -w 163745
+m+ running "bugz get 163745 -n -q" ...
+e+ could not extract a package from:
+e+     Please give testing keyword love to app-portage/gatt-svn
phoebe gatt-svn # gatt -w 166560
+m+ running "bugz get 166560 -n -q" ...
+e+ /etc/make.conf: PORTDIR_OVERLAY defined more then once# gatt -w 163745
+m+ running "bugz get 163745 -n -q" ...
+e+ could not extract a package from:
+e+     Please give testing keyword love to app-portage/gatt-svn

It has potential tho, keyword added ;]

------- Comment #4 From Matthias Langer 2007-02-13 19:48:09 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #3)
> phoebe gatt-svn # gatt -w 163745
> +m+ running "bugz get 163745 -n -q" ...
> +e+ could not extract a package from:
> +e+     Please give testing keyword love to app-portage/gatt-svn

gatt needs a __full__ package atom in the bugs summary, as
app-portage/gatt-svn-9999; if it is missing, you can do something like
# gatt -w 123456 foo/bar-1.2-r1

however, note that at the moment, gatt does not work for keywording bugs... i'm
planning to implement this in the near future.

> phoebe gatt-svn # gatt -w 166560
> +m+ running "bugz get 166560 -n -q" ...
> +e+ /etc/make.conf: PORTDIR_OVERLAY defined more then once# gatt -w 163745

hmm, i didn't know that defining variables like PORTDIR_OVERLAY more then once
makes sense, so gatt complains ... i'll look into this ...

------- Comment #5 From Raúl Porcel 2007-03-27 10:40:38 0000 ------- 
~ia64 done

------- Comment #6 From Raúl Porcel 2007-06-27 17:24:08 0000 ------- 
Will keyword if some user requests it, sorry.

Closing