Bug 163689

Summary:	mail-filter/amavisd-new-2.4.4 failed patch
Product:	Gentoo Linux	Reporter:	Elliot Van Resbeck <ellmout>
Component:	New packages	Assignee:	Net-Mail Packages <net-mail+disabled>
Status:	RESOLVED FIXED
Severity:	normal	CC:	antivirus
Priority:	High
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Package list:		Runtime testing required:	---

Description Elliot Van Resbeck 2007-01-25 01:28:40 UTC

When installing Amavisd, during the Patches sequence :
 * Failed Patch: amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch !
 *  ( /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch )
 *
 * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
 *
 *   /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new-2.4.4/temp/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8555.out

Content of /var/tmp/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new-2.4.4/temp/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch-8555.out :

***** amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch *****

=====================================================

PATCH COMMAND:   patch -p0 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch

=====================================================
patching file amavisd
Hunk #1 FAILED at 12914.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file amavisd.rej
=====================================================

PATCH COMMAND:   patch -p1 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch

=====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- amavisd    2006-04-07 22:03:15.000000000 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho      2006-04-07 22:07:00.000000000 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=====================================================

PATCH COMMAND:   patch -p2 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch

=====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- amavisd    2006-04-07 22:03:15.000000000 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho      2006-04-07 22:07:00.000000000 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=====================================================

PATCH COMMAND:   patch -p3 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch

=====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- amavisd    2006-04-07 22:03:15.000000000 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho      2006-04-07 22:07:00.000000000 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
=====================================================

PATCH COMMAND:   patch -p4 -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch < /usr/portage/mail-filter/amavisd-new/files/amavisd-new-2.4-qmail-lf-workaround.patch

=====================================================
missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
can't find file to patch at input line 3
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- amavisd    2006-04-07 22:03:15.000000000 +0200
|+++ amavisd.ticho      2006-04-07 22:07:00.000000000 +0200
--------------------------
No file to patch.  Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. emerve -av amavisd
2.
3.

Comment 1 Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2007-01-30 00:19:55 UTC

Looks like they changed that part of code in 2.4.4 slightly - I missed that, sorry. Sync in few hours and merge again, the ebuild now uses a new patch, which will apply cleanly to 2.4.4.

Thanks for reporting!