Summary: | dev-libs/nspr : using (almost deprecated) gnuconfig_update | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) <flameeyes> |
Component: | Eclasses | Assignee: | Mozilla Gentoo Team <mozilla> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | vapier |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | All | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | 169751 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 160173 |
Description
Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED)
2007-01-05 01:54:32 UTC
OK. Added nspr-4.6.4-r1, please check it out. I have masked it for now. ping mozilla Index: nspr-4.6.4-r1.ebuild =================================================================== RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/dev-libs/nspr/nspr-4.6.4-r1.ebuild,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -B -r1.1 nspr-4.6.4-r1.ebuild --- nspr-4.6.4-r1.ebuild 5 Jan 2007 21:43:27 -0000 1.1 +++ nspr-4.6.4-r1.ebuild 16 Jan 2007 20:33:41 -0000 @@ -22,11 +22,11 @@ src_unpack() { unpack ${A} cd "${S}" - EPATCH_OPTS="-p2" epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-config.patch - EPATCH_OPTS="-p2" epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-config-1.patch + epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-config.patch + epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-config-1.patch epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.4-config-2.patch - EPATCH_OPTS="-p2" epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-lang.patch - EPATCH_OPTS="-p2" epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-prtime.patch + epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-lang.patch + epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PN}-4.6.1-prtime.patch eautoreconf } Unless you have goo reason for needing the epatch ops? But I have yet to see any reason for it so I would revert it. Sure there is... What do you think, I just put it there? Adding files without -j will put them at the wrong place. (In reply to comment #4) > Sure there is... What do you think, I just put it there? > Adding files without -j will put them at the wrong place. > Aight mozilla herd has control of this package it has been surrendered by crypto, I will have that reverted and unmasked. (In reply to comment #4) > Sure there is... What do you think, I just put it there? > Adding files without -j will put them at the wrong place. > # You do not have to specify '-p' option to patch, as it will # try with -p0 to -p5 until it succeed, or fail at -p5. (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Sure there is... What do you think, I just put it there? > > Adding files without -j will put them at the wrong place. > > > > # You do not have to specify '-p' option to patch, as it will > # try with -p0 to -p5 until it succeed, or fail at -p5. > This what I initially done. Please try it your-self. You will see that at least the pkg-config stuff is going to the wrong place. But I don't mind. If you are going to maintain it do whatever you feel right. So what's left to do here? Just remove the mask? Is everyone OK with unmasking as-is? (In reply to comment #8) > So what's left to do here? Just remove the mask? Is everyone OK with unmasking > as-is? > Yeah, why not. We should make it stable asap. Unmasked the fixed version. We'll request a stabilization of that version soon. Reopen when the ebuilds are removed please, no one moment before. This was finally done. |