Summary: | '!!! ERROR: Couldn't find a VM dep' in new java system. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Peter Volkov (RETIRED) <pva> |
Component: | [OLD] Unspecified | Assignee: | Java team <java> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
Peter Volkov (RETIRED)
2006-08-31 01:03:55 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) > Seem that this is feature, and there were were attempts to document this: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/java-devel.xml#doc_chap4 > But IMO [] ordinary means the optional components, thus I'd say if this is > feature this should be stated explicitly! Uhm, that [] is clearly not optional, as >=virtual/{jre,jdk} is NOT a valid atom (despite broken repoman that doesn't utter a word about such broken deps) ;o) (In reply to comment #1) > Uhm, that [] is clearly not optional, as >=virtual/{jre,jdk} is NOT a valid > atom (despite broken repoman that doesn't utter a word about such broken deps) > ;o) Sure and that contradiction adds additional questions. IMHO something something like: >=virtual/jre-minimal.version or =virtula/jre-version is much more clear. And I'd like to read somewhere that specification of version is required. :) Added that the atoms must have a version for jre and jdk. You should also open a separate bug for the subshell issue. |