Bug 145614 - request version bump net-mta/postfix-2.3.3
Bug#: 145614 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 2006.0 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: net-mail@gentoo.org Reported By: erik@fmf.nl
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://high5.net/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Summary: request version bump net-mta/postfix-2.3.3
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-08-30 08:44 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-08-30 08:44 0000 
Hi,

There is a new Postfix 2.3 release (patchlevel 3). According to the changelog,
some small fixes have been made:

20060825

        Bugfix (introduced Postfix 2.3): with headers-only mail, a
        Milter "header insert" action corrupted the queue file. The
        cleanup server executed some end-of-body action before the
        end-of-header actions. File: cleanup/cleanup_message.c.

        Robustness: mail delivery agents now detect loops in queue
        files. Files with too many backward jumps are saved to the
        "corrupt" directory.  File: global/record.c.


Kind regards,

Erik Logtenberg.

------- Comment #1 From Conrad Kostecki 2006-09-11 03:46:42 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=96686) [details]
postfix-2.3.3.ebuild

postfix-2.3.3.ebuild

Compiles for me and is working.

------- Comment #2 From Erik Logtenberg 2006-09-11 05:29:22 0000 ------- 
Thanks. Seems fine to me.

------- Comment #3 From Alexander Stoll 2006-11-06 02:38:07 0000 ------- 
> postfix-2.3.3.ebuild
in the meantime 2.3.4 is released...
Is there any reason why 2.3.3 was not bumped?
Any info if we see 2.3.4 in official portage?

------- Comment #4 From Francesco R. (RETIRED) 2006-11-06 15:23:46 0000 ------- 
I use this package and I can take care of it if needed

------- Comment #5 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-11-09 12:36:00 0000 ------- 
Looks like Tuan has gone MIA. I will bump the package in few minutes.
Francesco, I will certainly get in touch with you, if Tuan won't appear soon -
I don't have the time to maintain postfix properly myself, it's a rather
important package.

------- Comment #6 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2006-11-10 03:50:01 0000 ------- 
OK, so it took bit more than few minutes, but it's there now. :)

Damn real life kicking in!