Bug 140371 - [QA] ebuilds that need conversion to emerge --config
Bug#: 140371 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 2006.0 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: DUPLICATE Assigned To: qa@gentoo.org Reported By: jakub@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: [QA] ebuilds that need conversion to emerge --config
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-07-14 08:53 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-07-14 08:53 0000 
Ebuilds in the attached list still ask users to run 'ebuild /path/to/ebuild
config' - please, fix them.

------- Comment #1 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-07-14 08:56:55 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=91715) [details]
list of affected ebuilds

Ebuilds that need info/ewarn/whatever changed to 'emerge --config
=${CATEGORY}/${PF}'

------- Comment #2 From Marien Zwart (RETIRED) 2006-07-14 09:38:19 0000 ------- 
I've dropped the old mod_python affected by this from the tree. Removing python
from the cc list, readd us if I missed something.

------- Comment #3 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-07-14 10:40:55 0000 ------- 
www-servers/aolserver fixed by CHTEKK.

------- Comment #4 From Michal Januszewski 2006-07-14 16:59:54 0000 ------- 
app-admin/hddtemp fixed.

------- Comment #5 From Luca Longinotti 2006-07-14 17:26:58 0000 ------- 
Both net-www/gentoo-webroot-default versions fixed.
Best regards, CHTEKK.

------- Comment #6 From SpanKY 2006-07-14 22:09:35 0000 ------- 
glftpd / sal-client fixed

------- Comment #7 From Konstantin Arkhipov 2006-07-28 08:15:48 0000 ------- 
net-dns/bind plo^w fixed.

------- Comment #8 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-09-10 03:34:44 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=96567) [details]
updated list of affected ebuilds

------- Comment #9 From Gustavo Felisberto 2006-09-11 03:58:33 0000 ------- 
Fixed tor

------- Comment #10 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-10-05 00:27:21 0000 ------- 
Isn't this a dupe of #109482 ?
But anyway, fobbit is taking the way of the dodo, and digitaldj fixed, so
removing sound.

------- Comment #11 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-10-05 00:45:12 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #10)
> Isn't this a dupe of #109482 ?

Looks like that... the other bug has been dead for way too long :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 109482 ***