Bug 137855 - quake2-icculus build error USE="rogue"
Bug#: 137855 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 2006.0 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: games@gentoo.org Reported By: master_up@post.cz
Component: Games
URL: 
Summary: quake2-icculus build error USE="rogue"
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-06-24 09:15 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-06-24 09:15 0000 
I cannot build quake2-icculus because:

src/rogue/g_items.c:37: error: static declaration of

------- Comment #1 From Pinky 2006-06-24 09:15:45 0000 ------- 
I cannot build quake2-icculus because:

src/rogue/g_items.c:37: error: static declaration of ‘jacket_armor_index’
follows non-static declaration
src/rogue/g_local.h:548: error: previous declaration of ‘jacket_armor_index’
was here
src/rogue/g_items.c:38: error: static declaration of ‘combat_armor_index’
follows non-static declaration
src/rogue/g_local.h:549: error: previous declaration of ‘combat_armor_index’
was here
src/rogue/g_items.c:39: error: static declaration of ‘body_armor_index’
follows non-static declaration
src/rogue/g_local.h:550: error: previous declaration of ‘body_armor_index’
was here
make[1]: *** [releasei386/rogue/g_items.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/quake2-icculus-0.16.1/work/quake2-r0.16.1'
make: *** [build_release] Error 2


Portage 2.1.1_pre1-r2 (default-linux/x86/2005.1, gcc-4.1.1/vanilla,
glibc-2.4-r3, 2.6.17.1-K7 i686)
System uname: 2.6.17.1-K7 i686 AMD Sempron(tm)   2500+

------- Comment #2 From Pinky 2006-06-24 09:16:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=90040) [details]
fix this problem, (is the same fix as in xatrix)

------- Comment #3 From Paul Bredbury 2006-06-24 16:02:19 0000 ------- 
In case anyone's interested, qudos-9999 on bug #137520 (which is based on
quake2-icculus) works with the rogue and xatrix mission packs.

------- Comment #4 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-06-27 14:45:13 0000 ------- 
Fixed in CVS... thanks for the patch... was this patch sent upstream?

------- Comment #5 From SpanKY 2006-06-27 20:09:42 0000 ------- 
make yourself useful zakk and commit this upstream ;)