Bug 137540 - app-dicts/kasumi/files/kasumi-2.0-gcc41.patch wouldn't fix compilation error.
Bug#: 137540 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: cjk@gentoo.org Reported By: hiyuh.root@gmail.com
Component: GCC Porting
URL:  http://kasumi.sourceforge.jp/index.php?%A5%D0%A5%B0%CA%F3%B9%F0%2F73
Summary: app-dicts/kasumi/files/kasumi-2.0-gcc41.patch wouldn't fix compilation error.
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-06-21 21:56 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-06-21 21:56 0000 
app-dicts/kasumi-2.0 seems have a patch for gcc-4.1 in the tree.
but it wouldn't fix.
a correct patch's info can be available that URL.

------- Comment #1 From KIMURA Masaru / hiyuh 2006-06-21 21:57:12 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89773) [details]
my "emerge --info" output

------- Comment #2 From KIMURA Masaru / hiyuh 2006-06-21 21:58:28 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89774) [details]
a log of kasumi-2.0 emerge failed

------- Comment #3 From KIMURA Masaru / hiyuh 2006-06-21 21:59:21 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89775) [details]
a log of kasumi-2.0 success log (with new patch)

------- Comment #4 From KIMURA Masaru / hiyuh 2006-06-21 22:01:43 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=89776) [details]
a correct patch for app-dicts/kasumi-2.0

This patch is a just copy of the upstream bug report.
http://kasumi.sourceforge.jp/index.php?%A5%D0%A5%B0%CA%F3%B9%F0%2F73

------- Comment #5 From KIMURA Masaru / hiyuh 2006-06-21 22:15:52 0000 ------- 
block 117482 for gcc-4.x porting tracker.

------- Comment #6 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-06-22 00:32:46 0000 ------- 
kasumi

------- Comment #7 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-06-22 05:24:24 0000 ------- 
I'll take care.

------- Comment #8 From Diego E. 'Flameeyes' Pettenò 2006-06-22 05:31:04 0000 ------- 
Thanks for the patch, applied now.

------- Comment #9 From Mamoru KOMACHI (RETIRED) 2006-06-22 07:07:09 0000 ------- 
Oops, sorry. I do not have gcc-4.1 so I simply copied the patch from 0.10 and
tested on only gcc-3.4 environment. (I should've checked at least the function
calls used in the two files affected) I apologise for the annoyance.