Bug 137414 - dev-libs/libusb-0.1.10a doesn't want to build in catalyst
Bug#: 137414 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: liquidx@gentoo.org Reported By: agaffney@gentoo.org
Component: Unspecified
URL:  http://dev.gentoo.org/~agaffney/misc/libusb_failure.log
Summary: dev-libs/libusb-0.1.10a doesn't want to build in catalyst
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-06-20 13:43 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-06-20 13:43 0000 
For some reason, libusb-0.1.10a absolutely hates me for my x86 catalyst builds
running on amd64. The build failure is in the URL field for this bug. Oddly, I
could not reproduce the bug in any setup.

I stabilized libusb-0.1.11 in my snapshot, and it builds without a problem. Any
chance of getting libusb-0.1.11 pushed into stable in the next few weeks?

------- Comment #1 From Michael Sun 2006-06-21 23:37:27 0000 ------- 
I had the same problem when MAKEOPTS="-jN" (N > 1)

add the following line to Makefile.am fix this problem
libusbpp_la_DEPENDENCIES = libusb.la

It is already fixed in libusb-0.1.11.

------- Comment #2 From Andrew Gaffney 2006-06-22 08:27:24 0000 ------- 
I'm pretty sure I had tried a blank MAKEOPTS in catalyst, and I wasn't able to
reproduce it on my host system using -j7. Anyway, all the more reason to stable
0.1.11 :)

------- Comment #3 From Andrew Gaffney 2006-06-26 15:24:04 0000 ------- 
Can we get this either fixed in 0.1.10a or 0.1.11 stabilized?

------- Comment #4 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 04:11:43 0000 ------- 
please stablise dev-libs/libusb-0.1.11.

NOTE: do not stablise dev-libs/libusb-0.1.12! there are problems with it
regarding /proc and /dev support.

------- Comment #5 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 04:13:04 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 145536 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #6 From Alastair Tse (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 04:16:29 0000 ------- 
setting example first. stablising for x86.

------- Comment #7 From Markus Rothe 2006-09-02 12:50:22 0000 ------- 
ppc64 stable

------- Comment #8 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-09-02 20:23:23 0000 ------- 
Stable on SPARC

------- Comment #9 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2006-09-03 02:01:56 0000 ------- 
Stable on ppc.

------- Comment #10 From Joshua Kinard 2006-09-03 21:44:19 0000 ------- 
Stable on mips.

------- Comment #11 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-10-15 05:10:49 0000 ------- 
hppa stable

------- Comment #12 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-03-16 11:51:22 0000 ------- 
0.1.11 or later stable everywhere, closing.