Bug 134860 - version bump: java-gnome 2.14.3
Bug#: 134860 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: java@gentoo.org Reported By: andrew@operationaldynamics.com
Component: GNOME
URL:  http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/NewsTwoFourteenOne
Summary: version bump: java-gnome 2.14.3
Keywords:  InOverlay
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-05-29 20:12 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-05-29 20:12 0000
An update to the java-gnome series has been released. Ebuilds need updating.
java-gnome-2.14.1 should depend on:

glib-java 0.2.5

cairo-java-1.0.4 (depends on glib-java 0.2.5)

libgtk-java-2.8.5 (depends on cairo-java-1.0.4 and glib-java-0.2.5)

libgnome-java-2.12.3 (depends on libgtk-java 2.8.5 and glib-java 0.2.5)

libglade-java-2.12.4 (depends on libgtk-java 2.8.5 and glib-java 0.2.5 and
libgnome 2.12.3)

libgconf-java-2.12.3 (depnds on glib-java 0.2.5)

AfC

------- Comment #1 From foser (RETIRED) 2006-06-02 05:07:11 0000 -------
with my regards

------- Comment #2 From Josh Nichols (RETIRED) 2006-06-25 17:09:49 0000 -------
I've begun work on this in the experimental overlay:

https://svn.gentooexperimental.org/svn/java/gentoo-java-experimental/

The problem I'm having is with any of the packages that depend on libgtk-java:
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
./configure: line 18938: syntax error near unexpected token `2.8'
./configure: line 18938: `JG_GTK_JAVA(2.8)'

I'm told that JG_GTK_JAVA is a m4 macro, that somehow isn't getting stuck into
configure.

------- Comment #3 From Andrew Cowie 2006-07-04 05:13:54 0000 -------
I was able to duplicate this problem.

Which is weird, since it doesn't appear when you build from CVS. My suspicions
of what might be wrong include:

1) the manual re-auto*, ac*, etc that the ebuild does may not actually be
sufficient [pity you need to do that to pick up the macro patch]

2) the macros(?) from libgtk-java aren't being installed properly, which is
perhaps what libgnome-java and friends are looking for, which might be why
JG_GTK_JAVA(2.8) isn't being evaluated as a macro.

AfC

------- Comment #4 From Josh Nichols (RETIRED) 2006-10-07 21:39:11 0000 -------
Added to portage.