Bug 134514 – [binutils] Add '-z lazy' to ld

• Product: Gentoo Linux
• Status: RESOLVED FIXED

[Description Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 05:42:52 UTC]

Had trouble getting autotools to accept '-nonow' and pass it to gcc when linking the .so - it gets passed when generating the .la but not the .so.  However it does pass '-Wl,<blah>' properly, so I figured it'd be easier to add '-z nonow' to ld.
Patch to follow.

[Comment 1 solar (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 05:44:03 UTC]

I had a patch todo this at one point but I lost it. Lets see if yours is better ;)

[Comment 2 Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 05:45:47 UTC]

Created attachment 87638 [details, diff]
Add '-z nonow' support to ld

[Comment 3 solar (RETIRED) 2006-05-27 06:14:57 UTC]

Looks good. md5sum even probably matched what I had before.
This should probably be sent upstream also as it just makes sense.

[Comment 4 SpanKY 2006-06-03 22:22:21 UTC]

yes, please get this added upstream before our binutils

[Comment 5 Michal Suchanek 2006-06-13 05:36:53 UTC]

please, add the patch to allow building the X server on hadrened.

[Comment 6 Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-06-13 23:33:18 UTC]

Woohoo :)  Upstream accepted the change, with a modification; the option is '-z lazy' not '-z nonow'.

[Comment 7 Kevin F. Quinn (RETIRED) 2006-06-13 23:36:20 UTC]

Created attachment 89116 [details, diff]
Patch accepted upstream against HEAD

This is the patch that was accepted.  It may well apply with fuzz to older versions but I'll check and supply a patch against 2.16.1 if necessary.

[Comment 8 SpanKY 2006-06-14 21:57:52 UTC]

added to 2.16.94

i'll just wait until the next cvs snapshot for the 2.17.xx ebuilds

[Comment 9 SpanKY 2006-06-29 20:12:10 UTC]

2.16.1-r3 in portage now too with the patch so solar will get off my back

[Comment 10 solar (RETIRED) 2006-06-29 23:39:25 UTC]

I'm not done with you yet.. You forgot to upload the patchball :p