Bug 132931 - stabilize app-portage/eix-0.5.5
Bug#: 132931 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: ia64@gentoo.org Reported By: genstef@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: stabilize app-portage/eix-0.5.5
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-05-10 11:52 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-05-10 11:52 0000 
Blocks bug 132915

This solves many cache-related problems because of the new metadata cache:
    einfo "As of >=eix-0.5.4, \"metadata\" is the new default cache."
    einfo "It's independent of the portage-version and the cache used by
portage."


Please mark it stable.

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-10 12:26:50 0000 ------- 
x86 has been marked stable.
21:23 <+CIA-14> tove * gentoo-x86/app-portage/eix/ (ChangeLog
eix-0.5.5.ebuild): Stable on x86 (#132931)

maybe amd64 is also interested in this?

------- Comment #2 From Thomas Cort (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 13:25:07 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #1)
> maybe amd64 is also interested in this?

amd64 stable.

------- Comment #3 From Jeroen Roovers 2006-05-11 01:01:07 0000 ------- 
There's a whole bunch of arches out there. Is there a specific reason they were
not included?

------- Comment #4 From Jeroen Roovers 2006-05-11 01:59:11 0000 ------- 
Stable on hppa, FWIW.

------- Comment #5 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-11 13:59:02 0000 ------- 
Even alternative arches like stabilization bugs, I heard :)

------- Comment #6 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 06:27:31 0000 ------- 
sparc stable.

------- Comment #7 From nixnut 2006-05-13 08:58:04 0000 ------- 
Stable on ppc

------- Comment #8 From Fabian Groffen 2006-05-13 09:30:19 0000 ------- 
ppc-macos stable

------- Comment #9 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-14 05:20:19 0000 ------- 
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #10 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-06-01 10:29:37 0000 ------- 
ia64: please remove the old version when done, thx.

------- Comment #11 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2006-07-10 02:55:39 0000 ------- 
How bout mips and x86-fbsd?

------- Comment #12 From Vlastimil Babka (Caster) 2006-07-12 06:17:06 0000 ------- 
Maybe 0.5.6 should be stabilized quickly because bug 137784 is bad with stable
portage 2.1

------- Comment #13 From Aron Griffis (RETIRED) 2006-07-12 08:28:59 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #11)
> How bout mips and x86-fbsd?

with no previous version marked stable, they don't matter

(In reply to comment #12)
> Maybe 0.5.6 should be stabilized quickly because bug 137784 is bad with stable
> portage 2.1

that's up to the package maintainer and should be handled in a different bug.