Bug 132887 - x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4 stabilization request
Bug#: 132887 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: mips@gentoo.org Reported By: caleb@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: x11-libs/qt-3.3.6-r4 stabilization request
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-05-10 05:37 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-05-10 05:37 0000 
I'd like to request stabilization of qt-3.3.6-r1.  3.3.6 has been in portage
since Mar 17, and -r1 readds some patches that were present in previous
versions but got dropped in the initial revbump to make sure they were still
needed.

------- Comment #1 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-10 05:37:36 0000 ------- 
adding all arches

------- Comment #2 From Ferris McCormick 2006-05-10 07:45:56 0000 ------- 
I'll note that it builds and seems good for sparc, bug I don't use KDE so I am
not going to mark it stable.

------- Comment #3 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-10 18:43:51 0000 ------- 
Is there some reason this ebuild gets to bypass the "30 days in the tree before
being marked stable" policy?

------- Comment #4 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-11 02:46:53 0000 ------- 
stable on ppc64

------- Comment #5 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-11 04:04:37 0000 ------- 
It's your call.  3.3.6 has been stable 30 days.  3.3.6-r1 is simply me readding
patches that were present in 3.3.4 and 3.3.5 but I initially dropped when doing
3.3.6 because I wasn't sure if they were still needed or not.

------- Comment #6 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 05:19:27 0000 ------- 
SPARC'd

------- Comment #7 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 12:43:56 0000 ------- 
x86 done

------- Comment #8 From Luca Barbato 2006-05-12 14:30:57 0000 ------- 
ppc done

------- Comment #9 From Thomas Cort (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 15:33:51 0000 ------- 
stable on alpha.

------- Comment #10 From Steve Yin 2006-05-25 23:44:46 0000 ------- 
what about stable it on amd64?

------- Comment #11 From Guy Martin 2006-05-26 03:31:06 0000 ------- 
Made it stable yesterday on hppa.

------- Comment #12 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-26 07:28:14 0000 ------- 
amd64 is done

------- Comment #13 From Carsten Lohrke 2006-05-28 14:49:47 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #12)
> amd64 is done

 PDEPEND.bad                    2
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild: amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0)
['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']
   x11-libs/qt/qt-3.3.6-r1.ebuild:
amd64(default-linux/amd64/2006.0/no-multilib) ['~dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.6']


Looks like you haven't used repoman...

------- Comment #14 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-30 08:52:45 0000 ------- 
Strange... I used repoman... just forgot to commit on the qt-unixODBC ebuild...
got it now... sorry about that

------- Comment #15 From Bryan Østergaard (RETIRED) 2006-10-15 14:46:10 0000 ------- 
ia64 done.

------- Comment #16 From Caleb Tennis 2006-12-06 05:06:23 0000 ------- 
anyone on the mips team want to take a crack at this?

------- Comment #17 From Stuart Longland 2007-02-24 17:00:52 0000 ------- 
Just having a look now, it seems there is no qt-3.3.6-r1.  I have, however,
done some testing of qt-3.3.6-r5.  I have KDE 3.5.6 built against it, and
running quite successfully on my Loongson machine (mipsel).  I intend to test
it on big-endian MIPS too -- although I don't forsee any endianness-related
problems.

Which of the Qt releases would you prefer stabalised?

------- Comment #18 From Caleb Tennis 2007-02-24 17:13:51 0000 ------- 
3.3.6-r4 would be great

------- Comment #19 From Caleb Tennis 2007-04-11 14:45:14 0000 ------- 
Superceded by 172746