Bug 132349 - app-text/{poppler,poppler-bindings}-0.5.1-r1 stabilization request + >=app-text/evince-0.5.1 + app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8
Bug#: 132349 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: printing@gentoo.org Reported By: carlo@gentoo.org
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: app-text/{poppler,poppler-bindings}-0.5.1-r1 stabilization request + >=app-text/evince-0.5.1 + app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-05-05 07:06 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-05-05 07:06 0000 
We need it stable for stabilization of KDE 3.5. As everyone knows this affects
multiple packages, so the stabilization needs to happen coordinated. KDE
stabilization is not happening /that/ soon, but it helps if everyone is
prepared.

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-05 07:17:57 0000 ------- 
app-text/poppler-0.5.1-r1
app-text/xpdf-3.01-r8
app-text/poppler-bindings-0.5.1-r1
>app-text/evince-0.5.1

those need to go stable simultaneously to avoid compile-problems

------- Comment #2 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-10 05:45:45 0000 ------- 
Does anyone object to asking the arch teams to mark stable?

------- Comment #3 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-10 08:54:38 0000 ------- 
no objections, go ahead

------- Comment #4 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-12 15:46:52 0000 ------- 
For stablizing poppler-bindigs, is it known which version of qt-4* the
maintainers would prefer be stablized?

------- Comment #5 From Markus Rothe 2006-05-20 00:56:48 0000 ------- 
please, comment on what version of qt-4* should go stable.

------- Comment #6 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-05-20 01:50:02 0000 ------- 
qt herd: qt4 is needed in a stable version because poppler-bindings has a qt4
useflag and repoman needs all depends as stable. What version of qt-4* should
go stable?

------- Comment #7 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-22 04:34:12 0000 ------- 
4.1.2 is fine to go stable in my opinion.  I'll probably be opening a bug in a
day or so for the request.

------- Comment #8 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-25 09:20:25 0000 ------- 
This bug is set as a blocker for bug #132213 and I've seen no request yet for
marking any version of Qt4 stable.  Should we ignore this bug or should we be
markign Qt4 stable?

Thanks

------- Comment #9 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-25 09:24:44 0000 ------- 
sorry

qt4 is okay to mark stable - I just forgot to open a bug yet.  Will do so
shortly.

------- Comment #10 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-25 12:44:33 0000 ------- 
Uhh... so I marked all of this stable, including qt4, which seems to work... I
guess... anyway, x86 is done once you get around to filing the qt4 bug... =]

------- Comment #11 From Caleb Tennis 2006-05-25 12:47:56 0000 ------- 
Qt4 bug is at #134341

------- Comment #12 From Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) 2006-05-26 07:26:21 0000 ------- 
amd64 done... =]

------- Comment #13 From Chris Bainbridge (RETIRED) 2006-05-28 02:35:10 0000 ------- 
The recently marked stable poppler-0.5.1-r1 fails to compile. Please see bug
#134601. poppler-0.5.2 compiles ok.

------- Comment #14 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-05-29 12:47:39 0000 ------- 
SPARC is done.

------- Comment #15 From Stefan Schweizer 2006-08-18 18:12:32 0000 ------- 
long done