Bug 129136 - net-mail/mailman XSS issues
Bug#: 129136 Product:  Gentoo Security Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: minor Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: security@gentoo.org Reported By: jaervosz@gentoo.org
Component: Vulnerabilities
URL:  http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-announce/2006-April/000084.html
Summary: net-mail/mailman XSS issues
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: B4 [noglsa] DerCorny
Opened: 2006-04-07 07:42 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-04-07 07:42 0000
Mailman 2.1.8rc1 was released for the final test of 2.1.8.

Important: This is not only a release candidate but also include a fix 
for a cross-site scripting bug found in 2.1.7.  All sites running 
previous versions are adviced to upgrade to 2.1.8(rc1).  I am going to 
release the final by the next weekend if nothing serious happens.

------- Comment #1 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-04-07 10:43:59 0000 -------
net-mail, please provide fixed ebuilds, thank you. Do you want to wait for
stable (B4 has a target  delay of 20days, btw)?

------- Comment #2 From Tuan Van (RETIRED) 2006-04-12 15:26:50 0000 -------
net-mail team is not interested in maintain this package. It has a list of open
bugs ( http://tinyurl.com/fhhet ) and we don't have enough man power to test it
with every MTAs that mailman supports. Please find a new maintainer or
package.mask --> remove it from the tree.

Best regards,
Tuan V.

------- Comment #3 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-04-12 22:57:22 0000 -------
core mailed about new maintainer.

------- Comment #4 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2006-04-14 09:29:46 0000 -------
*** Bug 124624 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Martin Holzer (RETIRED) 2006-04-14 09:51:17 0000 -------
ebuild in cvs

------- Comment #6 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-04-15 00:40:49 0000 -------
mholzer/hanno please update maintainer information in metadata.xml

Arches please test and mark mailman-2.1.8_rc1 stable.

------- Comment #7 From Tobias Scherbaum 2006-04-15 08:18:12 0000 -------
ppc stable

------- Comment #8 From Jason Wever (RETIRED) 2006-04-15 17:16:00 0000 -------
Stable on SPARCenstein

------- Comment #9 From Mark Loeser 2006-04-16 20:58:08 0000 -------
x86 stable

------- Comment #10 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2006-04-28 12:20:20 0000 -------
amd64 is late

------- Comment #11 From Luis Medinas (RETIRED) 2006-04-29 09:21:47 0000 -------
amd64 done!

------- Comment #12 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2006-04-30 09:06:02 0000 -------
This one is ready for GLSA decision. I tend to vote NO.

------- Comment #13 From Stefan Cornelius (RETIRED) 2006-04-30 15:36:02 0000 -------
Voting no, too

------- Comment #14 From Raphael Marichez 2006-05-01 01:57:55 0000 -------
i tend to vote no

------- Comment #15 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2006-05-01 11:49:56 0000 -------
Voting no and closing.