OK, I can probably apply your fix if you say SBCL 0.9.9 works well with the 5.x
series common-lisp-controller. However the most recent version of SBCL for
~x86 keywords is 0.9.11 (added to portage at 2006/03/04 05:54:41). Is there
any reason you need 0.9.9 or is it possible you emerge "synced" between the
time clc 5.13 was committed (2006/04/01 19:49:47) and sbcl 0.9.11 was comitted?
This bug report did remind me to commit the new >=common-lisp-controller-5
dependency for cmucl though :)
Sorry about the confusion! -- I hadn't committed sbcl-0.9.11, it was still
sitting in my CVS workdir waiting for commit. I updated the dependency in both
0.9.9 and 0.9.11 ebuilds. Thanks for the note.
*sbcl-0.9.11 (04 Apr 2006)
04 Apr 2006; Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org>
-files/0.9.10/customize-target-features.lisp-prefix,
-files/0.9.10/install-clc.lisp, +files/0.9.11/README.Gentoo,
-files/0.9.10/customize-target-features.lisp-suffix,
-files/0.9.10/sbcl.sh,
+files/0.9.11/customize-target-features.lisp-prefix,
-files/0.9.10/README.Gentoo, -files/0.9.10/sbcl-gentoo.patch,
-files/0.9.10/sbclrc, +files/0.9.11/customize-target-features.lisp-suffix,
+files/0.9.11/install-clc.lisp, +files/0.9.11/sbcl.sh,
+files/0.9.11/sbcl-gentoo.patch, +files/0.9.11/sbclrc, sbcl-0.9.9.ebuild,
-sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild, +sbcl-0.9.11.ebuild:
New upstream version; Update dependencies for common-lisp-controller to
>=dev-lisp/common-lisp-controller-4*; Resolves Bug #128717; Removed keyword
masked sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild.
04 Mar 2006; Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@gentoo.org> sbcl-0.9.10.ebuild:
Temporary -* masking due to problem with FASL output paths in CLC.