Bug 123856 - libgsf-sharp 0.7 requires libgsf-gnome-1.pc in pkg-config dir; not installed
Bug#: 123856 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: joem@gentoo.org Reported By: gabebw@gmail.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: libgsf-sharp 0.7 requires libgsf-gnome-1.pc in pkg-config dir; not installed
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-02-23 13:57 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-02-23 13:57 0000 
When I emerge gsf-sharp 0.7, it fails with

checking for GSF... configure: error: Package requirements (libgsf-1 >= 1.13
libgsf-1 < 1.14 libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.13 libgsf-gnome-1 < 1.14) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the GSF_CFLAGS and GSF_LIBS environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
more details.

A simple "cp libgsf-1.pc libgsf-gnome-1.pc" in /usr/share/pkgconfig fixes it.

------- Comment #1 From John Galt 2006-02-23 13:58:08 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #0)
> When I emerge gsf-sharp 0.7, it fails with
> 
> checking for GSF... configure: error: Package requirements (libgsf-1 >= 1.13
> libgsf-1 < 1.14 libgsf-gnome-1 >= 1.13 libgsf-gnome-1 < 1.14) were not met.
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a non-standard prefix.
> 
> Alternatively you may set the GSF_CFLAGS and GSF_LIBS environment variables
> to avoid the need to call pkg-config.  See the pkg-config man page for
> more details.
> 
> A simple "cp libgsf-1.pc libgsf-gnome-1.pc" in /usr/share/pkgconfig fixes it.
> 

Err. Just realized that the title says libgsf-sharp. That should be gsf-sharp.
Sorry.

------- Comment #2 From Daniel Drake 2006-02-23 14:45:48 0000 ------- 
Oops. We do patch away the requirement but I forgot to run autoconf in the
ebuild.

------- Comment #3 From Daniel Drake 2006-03-02 05:05:43 0000 ------- 
Fixed the ebuild, thanks for reporting.

------- Comment #4 From Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2006-03-24 00:24:41 0000 ------- 
*** Bug 127368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #5 From Francisco Oltra 2006-04-23 10:51:37 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #4)
> *** Bug 127368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
> 

but it's not.