Bug 123167 - ck-sources now at 2.6.15-ck5
Bug#: 123167 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 2005.1 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: x86-kernel@gentoo.org Reported By: ace@staticwave.ca
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: ck-sources now at 2.6.15-ck5
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-02-17 07:05 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-02-17 07:05 0000
Please bump

------- Comment #1 From scott 2006-02-24 18:12:41 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=80665) [details]
ebuild for 2.6.15-ck4

This ebuild is based heavily on the ebuild for 2.6.15-ck3-r1.

------- Comment #2 From scott 2006-02-24 18:14:26 0000 -------
I only have this keyworded for ~x86, since that is all I have to test.  Both ck
and cks patches apply and build cleanly.

------- Comment #3 From Carsten Lohrke 2006-03-02 05:45:53 0000 -------
*** Bug 124620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

------- Comment #4 From Gabriel Devenyi 2006-03-02 05:52:35 0000 -------
New version now released again 2.5.15-ck5, *please* bump

------- Comment #5 From scott 2006-03-02 08:42:30 0000 -------
Created an attachment (id=81116) [details]
ebuild for 2.6.15-ck5

This ebuild is also based heavily on the ebuild for 2.6.15-ck3-r1.

I only have this keyworded for ~x86, since that is all I have to test.  Both ck
and cks patches apply and build cleanly.

------- Comment #6 From Gabriel Devenyi 2006-03-02 08:56:17 0000 -------
Thanks scott, I forgot to mention I used your previous ebuild, and I'll use
this one as well, its too bad that no one bothers to put this into portage (I
just noticed *all* the other packages were updated)

------- Comment #7 From Daniel Drake 2006-03-02 09:58:46 0000 -------
Each kernel package is maintained by usually one or two people, and it looks
like the ck-sources maintainer is inactive at the moment. It's not just a case
of putting ebuilds in portage, we have to test them (compile *and* boot) first,
and when you have 25 kernel packages in the tree you have a huge task on your
hand.

As for all other packages being up-to-date, I wish. We do keep our supported
kernels (see http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml) up-to-date, but
many of the others lack full maintenance.

------- Comment #8 From scott 2006-03-02 10:35:10 0000 -------
On ~x86, both ck and cks kernels boot without error.

All programs on the workstation (media players, IM clients, etc.) function as
before.  All services on the server (NFS, samba, and NIS) function as before.

------- Comment #9 From Leonard Khoo 2006-03-03 09:21:35 0000 -------
How come ck-sources does not include the genpatches extras?

K_WANT_GENPATCHES="base extras"

------- Comment #10 From scott 2006-03-03 09:47:39 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> How come ck-sources does not include the genpatches extras?
> 
> K_WANT_GENPATCHES="base extras"
> 

Check these links:
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-347635-highlight-genpatches+base+extras.html

-and-

http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/about.htm

genpatches base are a minimal set of security and bugfixes that come out ahead
of 2.6.x.y releases.  Con rolls all of the .y patches into his patchset, but he
doesn't get the in-betweens.

genpatches extras are, as the name suggests, extras.  They aren't strictly
necessary.  Con optimizes his patchset to maximize both performance and
stability.  Application of these extras could stray too far from his
optimizations.

------- Comment #11 From Micheal Marineau 2006-03-06 09:17:38 0000 -------
Sorry for not staying on top of this, I will get it into portage by the end of
the day.

------- Comment #12 From Micheal Marineau 2006-03-06 23:50:03 0000 -------
In portage, enjoy.