Bug 118371 - Improving net-dns/djbdns and updating djbdns-setup
Bug#: 118371 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: CLOSED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: TEST-REQUEST Assigned To: hansmi@gentoo.org Reported By: kalin@ThinRope.net
Component: Applications
URL:  rsync://rsync.tar.bz/gentoo-portage-pkalin
Summary: Improving net-dns/djbdns and updating djbdns-setup
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2006-01-09 02:35 0000
Description:   Opened: 2006-01-09 02:35 0000 
I was poking in my script (djbdns-setup) and it turned a bit unreadable, so I
fixed some whitespace, added some vim improvements and resolved the dependency
on /sbin/functiones.sh

After that had a look at the current net-dns/djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild and did fix
some comments and whitespace; Changed useq to use

Will be providing the patches below.
My portage overlay is accessible at:
  rsync://rsync.tar.bz/gentoo-portage-pkalin

------- Comment #1 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:37:31 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=76604) [details]
net-dns/djbdns/files/djbdns-setup.patch

The patch to my script, djbdns-setup that goes to net-dns/djbdns/files

------- Comment #2 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:38:57 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=76605) [details]
djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild.patch

Patch for current djbdns-1.05-r16.ebuild

------- Comment #3 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-09 02:40:55 0000 ------- 
(From update of attachment 76604 [details])
too long of a name for a patch, fixing.

------- Comment #4 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2006-01-21 04:18:51 0000 ------- 
Done in -r17. Can you test it, please?

------- Comment #5 From Kalin KOZHUHAROV 2006-01-23 09:35:54 0000 ------- 
Well, seems good to me.

newbin ${FILESDIR}/djbdns-setup-${PR} djbdns-setup
this is a good point

I see you didn't like the part about
 use ipv6 && {

I suggested that because it makes the code more clear and easier to maintain
(that is why there are a few more comments and the double chdir). 

It is all right by me both ways.

Let's wait for a bit more beating.

------- Comment #6 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2006-09-29 16:59:02 0000 ------- 
Closing