Summary: | HSFModem and Kernel 2.6.15 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | Russell Knighton <russell> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Gentoo Dialup Developers <net-dialup> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | major | ||
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | 2005.1 | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 118671 |
Description
Russell Knighton
2006-01-06 15:23:13 UTC
Please test hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-r1. This version contains both upstream patches (class_device_parent and refrigerator) merged into one patch because th original ones couldn't be merged simultaneously. I believe the class_device_parent solves the kernel panic. Ok, tests fine now. Thanks for the very quick response. You guys & gals do a fantastic job.... hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-r1 should be marked as stable on x86 after the probation period (1 month). I'll close this bug then. I end up with: * Applying hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-upstream-20060107.patch ... * Failed Patch: hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-upstream-20060107.patch ! * ( /usr/portage/net-dialup/hsfmodem/files/hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-upstream-20060107.patch ) * However, patching manually with -p1 instead of -p0 works... (I have amd64, but I do not think it is relevant in this case...) I keep forgetting about S dependance of the arch! my appologies... the fixed ebuild (that changes the current dir to MY_ARCH_S before applying the patch) is now in cvs. Unfortunately, I still end up with "Unable to handle kernel paging request" on amd64. I have "only" 2.6.14-gentoo-r5 kernel... are you speaking about something described in some other bug? I am unaware of such bug... Oh, sorry, of course... well, I opened #118999. I've marked hsfmodem-7.18.00.07-r1 stable on x86 before the scheduled time for allowing kernel 2.6.15 to be marked stable (bug 118671). |