Bug 117841 - Missing ghostscript-7.05.6.man.patch
|
Bug#:
117841
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: 2005.1
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: major
|
Priority: P1
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: printing@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: barbers@wowway.com
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: Missing ghostscript-7.05.6.man.patch
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2006-01-04 22:20 0000
|
The ghostscript-esp ebuild is broken because it attempts to use a non-existent
patch file called ghostscript-7.05.6.man.patch, but the patch file is named
ghostscript-esp-7.05.6.man.patch.
This can prevent many things from building due to their dependence on
ghostscript (such as samba and then consequentially many packages if 'samba' is
USE'd).
This is broken in the "stable" ghostscript-esp-7.07.1-r8 ebuild. I rsync'd on
2006-Jan-04.
I'm seeing this as well. Instead of ghostscript-7.05.6.man.patch, there's now a
ghostscript-esp-7.05.6.man.patch in the files directory.
Should this patch file be used instead?
I synced about 2 hours ago.
(In reply to comment #1)
> I'm seeing this as well. Instead of ghostscript-7.05.6.man.patch, there's now a
> ghostscript-esp-7.05.6.man.patch in the files directory.
>
> Should this patch file be used instead?
>
> I synced about 2 hours ago.
>
Yes, I forgot to mention that I symlinked the patch file, did a digest, and was
able to merge ghostscript-esp.
Created an attachment (id=76215) [details]
Patch against 7.07.1-r10 ebuild, making it use esp files
This patch makes the ebuild use patches named "esp", to reflect the renaming of
the actual patchfiles in the "files" directory.
I renamed the patches in CVS, thanks.
It will be available through rsync in an hour
*** Bug 117901 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 117934 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
