I've been looking around for bad dependencies on my system and see that the
most
recent versions of gob make it one of only two or three apps which explicitly
depend on glib-2.0*, rather than >=glib-2.0.0
It compiles fine with glib-2.1 (which is not in portage), and the most recent
ebuild should likely be changed to reflect this.
Furthermore, gob-1.99 and up have been masked since July with a note stating
that the dependencies on 1.x needed to be corrected. Only gnome-pilot and
evolution depend on 1.x (both with >=), and both compile fine with 2.0...
Given
this result, later versions of gob need not install into a seperate slot.
Thus, I believe that gob can also be safely unmasked.
(Note, however, that I tested evolution-1.2 and not 1.0.8)
For future reference, should similar reports be under component 'Ebuilds', or
is
this fine?
Did I have both of what around? gob? I used a custom ebuilds which used the
same
slot when I was testing that stuff, so emerge clean should've gotten rid of all
traces of the older version.
Not that the SLOT stuff is that important, though.