Bug 115944 - Gnome-2.12.1 should depend on glib>=2.8.0
Bug#: 115944 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: 2005.1 Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: normal Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: gnome@gentoo.org Reported By: leguaan@gmail.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: Gnome-2.12.1 should depend on glib>=2.8.0
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2005-12-18 08:41 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-12-18 08:41 0000
I emerged gnome-2.12.1
The portage took care of all the dependencies except
glib which should be >=2.8.0

FROM COMPILATION:
checking for i386-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for GNOME_DESKTOP... configure: error: Package requirements
(gdk-pixbuf-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 glib-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >=
2.6.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.0.0 libstartup-notification-1.0) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the GNOME_DESKTOP_CFLAGS and GNOME_DESKTOP_LIBS
environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for
more details.

!!! Please attach the config.log to your bug report:
!!! /var/tmp/portage/gnome-desktop-2.12.2/work/gnome-desktop-2.12.2/config.log

!!! ERROR: gnome-base/gnome-desktop-2.12.2 failed. 

FROM LOG FILE:
Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.8.0' but version of GLib is 2.6.5
configure:21625: $? = 1
Requested 'glib-2.0 >= 2.8.0' but version of GLib is 2.6.5
configure:21646: error: Package requirements (gdk-pixbuf-2.0 >= 2.4.0 gtk+-2.0
>= 2.4.0 glib-2.0 >= 2.8.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.6.0 gnome-vfs-2.0 >= 2.0.0
libstartup-notification-1.0) were not met.
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.

Alternatively you may set the GNOME_DESKTOP_CFLAGS and GNOME_DESKTOP_LIBS
environment variables
to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for
more details.

------- Comment #1 From Daniel Gryniewicz 2005-12-20 09:38:56 0000 -------
Fixed.  Sorry about that.