Summary: | Ardour - file exists that is not in the manifest and sandbox violation | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo Linux | Reporter: | David Stevenson <david> |
Component: | Current packages | Assignee: | Eldad Zack (RETIRED) <eldad> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | chriswhite, sound, tigger |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | x86 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- |
Description
David Stevenson
2005-11-30 17:07:40 UTC
Not directly sound team. Yep, this is right. Chris, I see no changelog about this file, what about the Manifest? RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/media-sound/ardour/files/ardour-0.99-scons.patch,v Working file: ardour-0.99-scons.patch head: 1.1 branch: 1.1.1 locks: strict access list: symbolic names: start: 1.1.1.1 keyword substitution: kv total revisions: 2; selected revisions: 2 description: ---------------------------- revision 1.1 date: 2005/11/30 09:37:56; author: chriswhite; state: Exp; branches: 1.1.1; Initial revision ---------------------------- revision 1.1.1.1 date: 2005/11/30 09:37:56; author: chriswhite; state: Exp; lines: +0 -0 ============================================================================= Patch removed, sorry about the issues this caused. This fixes the security violation, not sure if you want to change the bug for the sandbox violation. I can't reproduce the sandbox issue. After reversing the patch do you get sandbox errors? Thanks Chris, access violation fixed. The sandbox fault no change, so I removed Feature = "usersandbox" from make.conf and it now compiles fine. So I will count that as total fix. David |