Bug 111557 - net-anayzer/ntop: missing dependencies
|
Bug#:
111557
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: unspecified
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: normal
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: netmon@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: carlo@gentoo.org
|
|
Component: Ebuilds
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: net-anayzer/ntop: missing dependencies
|
|
Keywords:
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2005-11-05 06:41 0000
|
The ugly configure script autodetects glib-1. zlib and libxml2 are not listed
as
dependencies.
ntop-3.2 has proper dependency tracking
(In reply to comment #1)
> ntop-3.2 has proper dependency tracking
or not! configure.in is broken when it comes to options like --with-zlib or
--with-ssl (it actually interprets --with as --without and vice-versa).
The reversed options are:
--with-ssl
--with-zlib
--enable-snmp
--enable-ipv6
Configure is definately broken:
./configure --prefix=/usr --host=i386-pc-linux-gnu --mandir=/usr/share/man
--infodir=/usr/share/info --datadir=/usr/share --sysconfdir=/etc
--localstatedir=/var/lib --disable-ipv6 --enable-i18n --disable-snmp --with-ssl
--enable-sslv3 --disable-sslwatchdog --with-tcpd --without-zlib
--build=i386-pc-linux-gnu
Builds without ssl
-------------------------------------------------------------------
**Handling your --enable and --disable requests**
SSL?
...Disabled via ./configure command line option --without-ssl
*******************************************************************
*
* WARNING: You disabled ssl but explicitly or implicitly specified
* the conflicting options:
* --with-ossl-lib=
* --with-ossl-include=
* --enable-sslv3
*
*>>> Ignoring the option(s)
*
*??? 1. Remove the --without-ssl option
*??? or 2. Remove the conflicting --with-xxxxx-xxxxx or
* --enable-xxxxx options
*
*******************************************************************
--enable-sslv3 is the conflicting flag.
HTH,
Wendall
or --with-ssl on the other hand. I'm assuming this is v2 support.
Wendall
Alin, have you notified upstream about this problem?
I've just did, with a CC to you.
ive already posted upstream and had them fix it so there's no point in you guys
also posting stuff
fixed up the patch used in portage to handle the inverted options
