Bug 109246 - boxbackup-0.09.ebuild not splitted
|
Bug#:
109246
|
Product: Gentoo Linux
|
Version: 2004.3
|
Platform: All
|
|
OS/Version: Linux
|
Status: RESOLVED
|
Severity: enhancement
|
Priority: P2
|
|
Resolution: FIXED
|
Assigned To: app-backup@gentoo.org
|
Reported By: norguhtar@gmail.com
|
|
Component: Server
|
|
|
URL:
|
|
Summary: boxbackup-0.09.ebuild not splitted
|
|
Keywords: InCVS
|
|
Status Whiteboard:
|
|
Opened: 2005-10-13 22:47 0000
|
I'm think boxbackup.ebuild need split on two part: server-part & client-part.
Why? This is backup app. Client-part install & running offten, server-part
rarely. Why i'm need install server-part on clients ?
PS I'm added split ebuild to bug #82447, but when bug closed... i'm got in
portage three not splitted boxbackup-0.09.ebuild.
PPS Sorry my english very ugly ;)
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
I'm hestitant to split the ebuild, since upstream doesn't split as well as
accomodate in any way to have a split setup, IMHO.
I see your point, but considering the other packages in app-backup it doesn't
look to uncommon to me not to split. The only think I could think of is having
a "client-only" USE flag as in bacula, but then some obvious way to only install
the client should be in the build system. Simply 'rm -f'-ing might be enough as
well.
Opinions?
Okey. USE flag "client-only" also good solution.
Sorry for the delay.
I committed boxbackup-0.09-r1 which has a client-only USE-flag.
reopen this bug or open a new one if any problems occur.
I'm reopen bug. Where is init script for boxbackup client ? It's may running in
daemon mode.
there should be a bbackupd script for the client.
I don't understand the problem.
> I don't understand the problem.
boxbackup-client can operate in daemon mode, for this need init script.
(In reply to comment #6)
> boxbackup-client can operate in daemon mode, for this need init script.
This script is called bbackupd and is located in /etc/init.d/bbackupd
The ebuild is creating this one unconditionally, so it should always be there...
Huh. It's my mistake. Sorry