Bug 108206 - net-mail/uw-imap buffer overflow
Bug#: 108206 Product:  Gentoo Security Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: major Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: security@gentoo.org Reported By: jaervosz@gentoo.org
Component: Vulnerabilities
URL:  http://www.washington.edu/imap/
Summary: net-mail/uw-imap buffer overflow
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: B1 [glsa] jaervosz
Opened: 2005-10-05 11:35 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-10-05 11:35 0000
Install imap-2004g, or later version, to fix a buffer overflow problem.

------- Comment #1 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-10-05 11:37:26 0000 -------
net-mail please bump. 

------- Comment #2 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2005-10-05 15:06:00 0000 -------
uw-imap-2004g.ebuild is in CVS now. Note that it might not work with
FEATURES="collision-protect", as it has some common files with mail-client/pine.
Bug #105313 deals, or will deal with this.

------- Comment #3 From Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen 2005-10-05 22:26:14 0000 -------
Arches please test and mark stable. Note comment #2. 

------- Comment #4 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 04:14:20 0000 -------
uhm, wouldn't it be the best thing to block pine for 2004g and then split the
package into two parts as suggested in bug #105313 for -r1?

------- Comment #5 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 04:43:14 0000 -------
I'm working on the split, and will commit -r1 in a few minutes. I suggest arch
teams wait for -r1 and test it, along with keywording the new
net-mail/uw-mailutils package.

------- Comment #6 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 04:58:47 0000 -------
Ok, net-mail/uw-mailutils-2004g and net-mail/uw-imap-2004g-r1 are now in CVS,
with the latter DEPENDing on the former.

I've stripped KEYWORDS from the latter to just ~x86, arch teams, please keyword
uw-mailutils readd your arch back to uw-imap.

I'll do the x86 keyword, I'm testing uw-imap right now.

------- Comment #7 From Andrej Kacian (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 05:22:59 0000 -------
x86 tested and working

------- Comment #8 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 08:04:36 0000 -------
Both done for alpha.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #9 From Gustavo Zacarias (RETIRED) 2005-10-06 12:31:53 0000 -------
sparc stable.

------- Comment #10 From Brent Baude 2005-10-06 16:48:38 0000 -------
Ok, tested and marked ppc64 stable.

------- Comment #11 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-10-07 03:15:40 0000 -------
Stable on ppc and hppa. For the next time, please bump according to policy:
mark
all arches unstable (~), but leave them in KEYWORDS.

------- Comment #12 From Simon Stelling (RETIRED) 2005-10-07 04:47:28 0000 -------
does uw-imap really hard-depend on uw-mailutils? that way it's still not
possible to have both uw-imap and pine installed, now pine just collides with
uw-mailutils, which still doesn't have DEPEND=!mail-client/pine

anyway, this is not very critical, so amd64 is stable too

------- Comment #13 From Thierry Carrez (RETIRED) 2005-10-11 05:04:32 0000 -------
GLSA 200510-10