Bug 102183 - mutt-1.5.10 (version bump)
Bug#: 102183 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: agriffis@gentoo.org Reported By: ufs@sapo.pt
Component: Ebuilds
URL: 
Summary: mutt-1.5.10 (version bump)
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2005-08-11 18:47 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-08-11 18:47 0000
mutt-1.5.10 (version bump)

Let's see if this one get's out before mutt-1.5.11 comes out! ;)

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-08-12 02:25:46 0000 -------
Also note this is a rather major release since some patches (i.e. edit-threads)
have been integrated into mutt.

Aaron If you need help with this I'll be eager to help.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #2 From Martin Ehmsen (RETIRED) 2005-08-16 14:07:19 0000 -------
I also read at the header cache homepage
(http://wwwcip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/~sithglan/mutt/) that it should be
integrated into mutt from 1.5.10.
It says so on the front page.

------- Comment #3 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-08-17 04:26:48 0000 -------
Yes... I also noticed that the header cache has been fully merged.

We think that is pointless to still maintaining nntp support in mutt since not a
lot of people use it and muttng implements it. Also it difficults maintaining
mutt up to date and adding new patches so mutt-1.5.10 won't have nntp support.

I've been playing with mutt-1.5.10, I have a working (at least for me) ebuild in
my overlay:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy/overlay/mail-client/mutt/mutt-1.5.10-r1.ebuild

Though I'm having a little problem... switching from USE="vanilla" to
USE="-vanilla" makes mutt segfault while evaluating the cache. I still don't
know what's causing it. (I haven't tested if this happens with earlier mutt
versions yet).

If you could test that ebuild and report some feedback it'd be great.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #4 From Pedro Algarvio 2005-08-17 09:30:57 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Yes... I also noticed that the header cache has been fully merged.
> 
> We think that is pointless to still maintaining nntp support in mutt since not a
> lot of people use it and muttng implements it. Also it difficults maintaining
> mutt up to date and adding new patches so mutt-1.5.10 won't have nntp support.
> 
> I've been playing with mutt-1.5.10, I have a working (at least for me) ebuild in
> my overlay:
> 
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferdy/overlay/mail-client/mutt/mutt-1.5.10-r1.ebuild
> 
> Though I'm having a little problem... switching from USE="vanilla" to
> USE="-vanilla" makes mutt segfault while evaluating the cache. I still don't
> know what's causing it. (I haven't tested if this happens with earlier mutt
> versions yet).
> 
> If you could test that ebuild and report some feedback it'd be great.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ferdy


Try to delete the contents of your hader_cache directory to see if it stops
segfaulting...

It stopped with me with 1.5.9...

------- Comment #5 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-08-17 10:42:11 0000 -------
Well... removing the header_cache directory works... I meant *switching* made
it
segfault (and also run out of memory, i.e. weird situation).

From 'scratch' both (vanilla and -vanilla) work fine.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #6 From Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) 2005-08-17 10:46:47 0000 -------
I do use NNTP support in mutt and do not want to switch to another program for
NNTP alone. Therefore, it would be glad if you could continue including it.

------- Comment #7 From Fernando J. Pereda (RETIRED) 2005-08-17 10:59:40 0000 -------
Just heard from Aaron that we will continue to support nntp.

Cheers,
Ferdy

------- Comment #8 From Pedro Algarvio 2005-08-17 11:17:58 0000 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well... removing the header_cache directory works... I meant *switching* made it
> segfault (and also run out of memory, i.e. weird situation).
> 
> From 'scratch' both (vanilla and -vanilla) work fine.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ferdy

Exactly what happened to me, segfault on one comp and out of memory on another...

------- Comment #9 From Aron Griffis (RETIRED) 2005-08-17 13:05:20 0000 -------
ok, 1.5.10 is in portage now