Summary: | Samba's configure fails on other OSs because --with-smbmount is linux-specific. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Gentoo/Alt | Reporter: | Javier Villavicencio (RETIRED) <the_paya> |
Component: | Other | Assignee: | Gentoo/BSD Team <bsd+disabled> |
Status: | RESOLVED FIXED | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | egore, samba, seemant |
Priority: | High | ||
Version: | unspecified | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | FreeBSD | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Package list: | Runtime testing required: | --- | |
Attachments: |
moves --with-smbmoung to $(use_with kernel_linux smbmount)
Patch for the ebuild. Patch to fix the subins pamd file |
Description
Javier Villavicencio (RETIRED)
2005-08-07 13:38:56 UTC
Created attachment 65344 [details, diff]
moves --with-smbmoung to $(use_with kernel_linux smbmount)
Not sure if this is right, i'm just guessing here, and haven't tested it yet on
Gentoo/Linux
(In reply to comment #1) > Created an attachment (id=65344) [edit] > moves --with-smbmoung to $(use_with kernel_linux smbmount) > > Not sure if this is right, i'm just guessing here, and haven't tested it yet on > Gentoo/Linux That patch *should* work. It looks fine to me. Setting product, CCing seemant. The patch does not work (see the ')' that there shouldn't be?), and also it needs a few other changes to work, I'll attach the ebuild patch, a source patch (that I need to test before) and a new pamd file. Created attachment 65525 [details, diff]
Patch for the ebuild.
Created attachment 65527 [details, diff]
Patch to fix the subins
Created attachment 65528 [details]
pamd file
little thought on pam-include: it requires pam>=0.78, which isn't stable (at now) for ia64. Using the proposed pam conf file will not function on that arch. Yes that's why I added virtual/pam to dependency for that. So it needs a revbump to be marked ~all for now. diego, the original pathch that added subins in the first place was a gentoo patch -- so the subin_extras thing is even further away from the original -- can I ask you to just adjust our original subins patch (found in the tarballs)? Yeah it was just that doing the test patch here with a clean patch was more difficult to test than an incremental patch over the patches :) *** Bug 102462 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** samba-3.0.20 in cvs |