Bug 101324 - unionfs: new version 1.0.13
Bug#: 101324 Product:  Gentoo Linux Version: unspecified Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux Status: RESOLVED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2
Resolution: FIXED Assigned To: genstef@gentoo.org Reported By: hakan@gurkensalat.com
Component: Ebuilds
URL:  http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/project-unionfs.html
Summary: unionfs: new version 1.0.13
Keywords:  
Status Whiteboard: 
Opened: 2005-08-04 06:30 0000
Description:   Opened: 2005-08-04 06:30 0000 
Version bump. Included is a patch to fix a compile bug in xattr.c

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

------- Comment #1 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:32:27 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65063) [details]
ebuild

------- Comment #2 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:32:59 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65064) [details]
unionfs-1.0.13.ebuild

------- Comment #3 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:33:48 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65065) [details]
patch to make unionfs compile on amd64

------- Comment #4 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-04 06:34:13 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65066) [details]
patch to make xattr.c compile

------- Comment #5 From Stefan Schweizer 2005-08-04 12:48:56 0000 ------- 
Can you please attach only unified diffs (diff -u oldfile newfile) with your
changes?

------- Comment #6 From Zac Medico 2005-08-05 16:43:52 0000 ------- 
dosbin snapmerge
dodoc patch-kernel.sh

------- Comment #7 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 06:28:25 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65307) [details]
unionfs-1.0.13.ebuild

As requested, added the /sbin/snapmerge and .../doc/patch-kernel.sh to the
ebuild.

------- Comment #8 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 06:30:50 0000 ------- 
(In reply to comment #5)
> Can you please attach only unified diffs (diff -u oldfile newfile) with your
> changes?

Sorry, I don't understand that request. The patches to the .c files are unified
diffs (which have to be applied seperately).

Do you want me to provide the ebuild as an diff, too?

Regards,
Hakan

------- Comment #9 From Stefan Schweizer 2005-08-07 07:49:41 0000 ------- 
Yes, please attach unified diffs agianst the ebuild in portage instead of full
ebuilds.

------- Comment #10 From Hakan Tandogan 2005-08-07 08:09:01 0000 ------- 
Created an attachment (id=65315) [details]
diff against the 1.12a ebuild

------- Comment #11 From Stefan Schweizer 2005-08-11 02:01:01 0000 ------- 
Oh, and please don't attach patches that you have not changed (amd64 patch)
It is now in cvs, thank you all.