<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>98106</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-07-06 04:26 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Jtds 1.0.3 has been incorrect SLOT value in ebuild file</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2006-01-03 16:16:57 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Applications</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>trivial</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>rusxakep@mail.ru</reporter>
          <assigned_to>java@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rusxakep@mail.ru</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-06 04:26:37 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>DESCRIPTION=&quot;Open source JDBC 3.0 Type 4 driver for Microsoft SQL Server (6.5,
7.0, 2000 and 2005) and Sybase.&quot;
SRC_URI=&quot;mirror://sourceforge/${PN}/${P}-src.zip&quot;
HOMEPAGE=&quot;http://jtds.sourceforge.net&quot;
LICENSE=&quot;LGPL-2.1&quot;
SLOT=&quot;0.9&quot;
KEYWORDS=&quot;~x86 ~amd64&quot;


Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual Results:  
jtds install to /usr/share/jtds-0.9

Expected Results:  
jtds install to /usr/share/jtds</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>jakub@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-06 04:50:30 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Hmm, 1.0.{2,3} also have SLOT=&quot;0.9&quot;...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rusxakep@mail.ru</who>
            <bug_when>2005-07-06 05:47:39 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Yes, is strange. But,isn&apos;t strong bug, is misprint ...</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rusxakep@mail.ru</who>
            <bug_when>2005-08-01 23:20:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>cat /etc/fstab
/dev/cciss/c0d0p1       /boot           ext3            noatime,ro              1 2
/dev/cciss/c0d0p3       /               reiserfs        noatime,notail          0 2
/dev/cciss/c0d0p2       none            swap            sw                      0 0
none                    /proc           proc            defaults                0 0
none                    /dev/shm        tmpfs           defaults                0 0
/dev/vg/u01             /u01            reiserfs        noatime                 0 2
/dev/vg/u02             /u02            ext3            noatime                 0 2
/dev/vg/tmp             /tmp            ext2            defaults                0 1
/dev/vg/usr             /usr            reiserfs        noatime                 0 2
/dev/vg/var             /var            reiserfs        noatime                 0 2
/dev/vg/log             /var/log        reiserfs        defaults                0 2
</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rusxakep@mail.ru</who>
            <bug_when>2005-08-01 23:23:55 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>blah!! Ignore previous comment.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-09-21 00:03:27 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well it was initially put to slot 0.9 but the later releases have been binary
compatible so they were put to the same slot. The slot can be changed to
something else of course put not anything very high priority.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>rusxakep@mail.ru</who>
            <bug_when>2005-12-13 03:48:29 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>version bump! 1.2 has been released!</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>betelgeuse@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2006-01-03 16:16:57 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>(In reply to comment #6)
&gt; version bump! 1.2 has been released!
&gt; 

1.2 now in the tree and SLOT is 1.2 because I wasn&apos;t happy with the japitools results against 1.0.3. I think this bug can be closed now as we are not going to change the slots of the old ebuilds.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
    </bug>

</bugzilla>