<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>96323</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-06-16 17:02 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>adm8211-20050323 (New Package)</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-06-21 10:01:06 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Core system</component>
          <version>2005.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          <bug_file_loc>http://aluminum.sourmilk.net/adm8211/</bug_file_loc>
          
          <keywords>EBUILD, REQUEST</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>96692</blocked>
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>weaver@gentoo.org</reporter>
          <assigned_to>mobile@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          <cc>kernel@gentoo.org</cc>
    
    <cc>release@gentoo.org</cc>

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weaver@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-16 17:02:34 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>AVT8211 is a 802.11b chip. I&apos;m not sure how broadly it&apos;s used but I have one. There is a driver in advanced development at http://aluminum.sourmilk.net/adm8211/ and it looks stable on my machine. The driver hasn&apos;t been accepted to the mainline kernel yet (maybe to -mm, I haven&apos;t checked).

Sample lspci output:
0000:00:0d.0 Network controller: Linksys ADMtek ADM8211 802.11b Wireless Interface (rev 11)

Please include in gentoo-sources.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>dsd@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 01:16:33 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>mobile: fancy patching the makefile and writing an ebuild to build this as an
external kernel module?

This won&apos;t be included in gentoo-sources but it should be easy to build outside
of the kernel sources for now.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 01:29:41 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Actually, the provided Makefile is geared towards external compilation. Should
be trivial to write a linux-mod.eclass based ebuild for it.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 02:51:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=61375)
adm8211-20050323.ebuild

Here&apos;s an ebuild for the adm8211-20050323 driver. Please test.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weaver@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 05:08:44 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>May I add that a separate package is of not much use to someone who wants to
boot, connect and install from livecd and whose only network card is an adm8211.
What&apos;s the policy that prevents this from going into gentoo-sources?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>henrik@brixandersen.dk</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 05:15:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Well, if this ebuild makes it way into portage you just need to convince our
release engineers to include it on the next livecd.

It will not go into gentoo-sources as it can be handled as en external ebuild
more easily. This is the way gentoo works; if something can be done as a
stand-alone ebuild it should be preferred. This way we can update the adm8211
driver without having to bump the kernel version - and only users who actually
need that particular driver will have to install it.

Have you tested the attached ebuild?</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weaver@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-17 08:43:46 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>The ebuild works fine here, thanks.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 05:05:28 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>in portage now. The old adm8211-20050323 version is marked stable on x86, please
include it on the livecd.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 05:07:14 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>fixed</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weaver@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 09:33:43 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Works for me on amd64, please add keyword</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>genstef@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 09:55:22 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>please open a separate bugreport for amd64</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>weaver@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 10:01:06 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Bug 96714</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>61375</attachid>
            <date>2005-06-17 02:51 0000</date>
            <desc>adm8211-20050323.ebuild</desc>
            <filename>adm8211-20050323.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA1IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>