95802 2005-06-11 14:07 0000 Stablizing stunnel-4.09 2006-05-18 22:12:22 0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Gentoo Linux Ebuilds unspecified All Other RESOLVED WORKSFORME P2 normal --- 1 ramereth@gentoo.org ramereth@gentoo.org ppc-macos@gentoo.org ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-11 14:07:50 0000 Hey all, Just got done marking stunnel 4.09 stable for x86. I think it's pretty ready for the rest of you folks to do the same if you feel like it. I should note that I changed how the ebuild worked from the previous stable version. The major change is the location for the pid file. It was in /etc/stunnel, and now resides in /var/run/stunnel. The init script should warn the users if they are still using the old location. Please mark as you see fit. vapier@gentoo.org 2005-06-11 14:10:42 0000 arm stable kugelfang@gentoo.org 2005-06-11 17:48:09 0000 amd64 stable kugelfang@gentoo.org 2005-06-11 18:04:52 0000 Bleh, removing from CC... nixnut@gentoo.org 2005-06-12 11:15:08 0000 Emerging on my ppc box yields the error below. * Adding group 'stunnel' to your system ... * - Groupid: next available * Adding user 'stunnel' to your system ... * - Userid: 103 * - Shell: /bin/false * - Home: -1 * - Groups: stunnel useradd: invalid home directory `-1' !!! ERROR: net-misc/stunnel-4.09 failed. !!! Function enewuser, Line 611, Exitcode 3 !!! enewuser failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, NOT this status message. !!! FAILED postinst: 1 emerge info: Portage 2.0.51.19 (default-linux/ppc/2005.0, gcc-3.4.3, glibc-2.3.4.20041102-r1, 2.6.11-h3 ppc) ================================================================= System uname: 2.6.11-h3 ppc Gentoo Base System version 1.4.16 Python: dev-lang/python-2.3.5 [2.3.5 (#1, Jun 1 2005, 18:21:02)] dev-lang/python: 2.3.5 sys-apps/sandbox: [Not Present] sys-devel/autoconf: 2.13, 2.59-r6 sys-devel/automake: 1.5, 1.4_p6, 1.8.5-r3, 1.6.3, 1.7.9-r1, 1.9.5 sys-devel/binutils: 2.15.90.0.3-r5 sys-devel/libtool: 1.5.16 virtual/os-headers: 2.6.8.1-r4 ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="ppc" AUTOCLEAN="yes" CFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=G4 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" CHOST="powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu" CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/env /usr/kde/3.3/share/config /usr/kde/3.3/shutdown /usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/lib/X11/xkb /usr/lib/mozilla/defaults/pref /usr/share/config /var/qmail/control" CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/terminfo /etc/env.d" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -mtune=G4 -maltivec -mabi=altivec -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles" FEATURES="autoaddcvs autoconfig ccache distlocks sandbox sfperms strict userpriv usersandbox" GENTOO_MIRRORS="http://distfiles.gentoo.org http://distro.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo" MAKEOPTS="-j2" PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages" PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp" PORTDIR="/usr/portage" PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage" USE="ppc X alsa berkdb bitmap-fonts crypt cups curl eds emboss esd fam fortran gif gnome gpm gstreamer gtk gtk2 imlib ipv6 jpeg kde libwww motif mozilla mp3 mpeg ncurses nls ogg oggvorbis opengl pam pdflib perl png python qt readline slang spell ssl tcpd tiff truetype truetype-fonts type1-fonts unicode vorbis xml2 xprint xv zlib userland_GNU kernel_linux elibc_glibc" Unset: ASFLAGS, CBUILD, CTARGET, LANG, LC_ALL, LDFLAGS, LINGUAS ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-12 11:23:41 0000 (In reply to comment #4) > Emerging on my ppc box yields the error below. > > * Adding group 'stunnel' to your system ... > * - Groupid: next available > * Adding user 'stunnel' to your system ... > * - Userid: 103 > * - Shell: /bin/false > * - Home: -1 > * - Groups: stunnel > useradd: invalid home directory `-1' Make sure you have the newest eclass for eutils. This should have been resolved from bug #93777 nixnut@gentoo.org 2005-06-12 12:57:32 0000 Emerged fine after an emerge sync throw_away_2002@yahoo.com 2005-06-12 21:41:54 0000 Don't know how much of this you can affect, but.... Had an old version installed (but never got around to using it). When I updated to 4.09, the ebuild regenerated stunnel.crt, stunnel.csr, stunnel.key, and stunnel.pem (prepending ._cfg0000 to each). This doesn't seem like a good idea to me. I always merge configuration files manually (with diff), and I noticed that all off the new files had root:root as the owners (the original files all had stunnel:stunnel as the owner). I don't know if this represents a limitation in portage, but it seemed possible for someone to do the "wrong thing" (either change the ownership to root:root when the maintainer wanted to keep stunnel:stunnel, or leave it as stunnel:stunnel when the maintainer had some reason to change it to root:root in the newer version). Completely confused, I simply unmerged stunnel, deleted ALL of the configuration files, and then reinstalled. All of the files in /etc/stunnel show ownership by stunnel:stunnel now (but I remember the directory itself had stunnel:root before, versus root:root now). Again, I don't know how much you can control this through the ebuild system, but it seems like something to make sure ends up right, if possible. Thanks. weeve@gentoo.org 2005-06-17 22:20:23 0000 A little SPARC to brighten your day! wormo@gentoo.org 2005-06-18 00:09:44 0000 removing ppc from cc, since it has been marked stable ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-18 09:34:26 0000 Woohoo! Now we just have the alpha slackers to wait on ;-) ferdy@gentoo.org 2005-06-18 15:00:38 0000 And last but not least ................... the mighty alpha flavour ! Best regards, Ferdy ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-18 19:41:06 0000 Thanks for stabilizing. ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-22 06:39:55 0000 I cleaned out some old stunnel ebuilds and noticed (after I had done it, bad me!) that I took out the only ebuild that was flagged for ppc-macos. I noticed the old ebuild had a few tricks in it to make it work. Would you mind seeing if you can mark 4.09 testing (since thats what you had before)? Cheers, ramereth@gentoo.org 2005-06-24 17:47:50 0000 FYI, I restored 3.23, but I still recommend you upgrade to 4.09 whenever you get a chance. j4rg0n@gentoo.org 2005-06-26 17:54:50 0000 Can you give testing instructions? ramereth@gentoo.org 2006-05-18 22:12:22 0000 Closing old bug