<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "http://bugs.gentoo.org/bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="2.22.7"
          urlbase="http://bugs.gentoo.org/"
          maintainer="bugzilla@gentoo.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>95577</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2005-06-09 10:02 0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>wepattack ebuild fixes</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2005-06-21 17:05:07 0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Gentoo Linux</product>
          <component>Ebuilds</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>x86</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <keywords>Inclusion</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter>egore@gmx.de</reporter>
          <assigned_to>netmon@gentoo.org</assigned_to>
          

      

      
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>egore@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-09 10:02:01 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I stumbled upon some (imo) ugly things in wepattack. For example some parts of
it are useless without johntheripper, the die messages were without details,
some detail messages were missing, the wepattack.conf was useless.
I added a useflag for johntheripper, not sure if usefull or not, but IMO a good
idea.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>egore@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-09 10:02:50 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=60919)
net-wireless/wepattack-0.1.3-r2

the ebuild</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>egore@gmx.de</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-09 10:03:31 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>Created an attachment (id=60920)
wepattack.conf

correct wepattack.conf</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vanquirius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 14:48:03 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>I don&apos;t have wireless gear with me to test the modifications, but they look
neat. I don&apos;t see why not accept them, good work. (Can somebody actually test
this before committing?)</thetext>
          </long_desc>
          <long_desc isprivate="0">
            <who>vanquirius@gentoo.org</who>
            <bug_when>2005-06-21 17:05:07 0000</bug_when>
            <thetext>in -r2. Thanks for reporting.</thetext>
          </long_desc>
      
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>60919</attachid>
            <date>2005-06-09 10:02 0000</date>
            <desc>net-wireless/wepattack-0.1.3-r2</desc>
            <filename>wepattack-0.1.3-r2.ebuild</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyBDb3B5cmlnaHQgMTk5OS0yMDA0IEdlbnRvbyBGb3VuZGF0aW9uCiMgRGlzdHJpYnV0ZWQgdW5k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=
</data>        

          </attachment>
          <attachment
              isobsolete="0"
              ispatch="0"
              isprivate="0"
          >
            <attachid>60920</attachid>
            <date>2005-06-09 10:03 0000</date>
            <desc>wepattack.conf</desc>
            <filename>wepattack.conf</filename>
            <type>text/plain</type>
            <data encoding="base64">IyAvZXRjL3dlcGF0dGFjay5jb25mCiMKIyBDb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGZvciBXRVBBVFRBQ0sKIyBE
b21pbmlrIEJsdW5rIGFuZCBBbGFpbiBHaXJhcmRldCBhbmQgQ2hyaXN0b3BoIEJyaWxsCiMgMDgt
MDYtMjAwNQojCgpKT0hORElSPS91c3Ivc2JpbgpXT1JETElTVD0vdXNyL3NoYXJlL2pvaG4vcGFz
c3dvcmQubHN0Cg==
</data>        

          </attachment>
    </bug>

</bugzilla>